Mia-Elle Lieverst🇳🇱
Professional report →▸About this sample
Current team: cannot be proven from the index. What you see is the latest trace and the last known club, not today's confirmation.
From the U20 women's national teams 2026 box score · newest the index has for that competition: 2026 · index updated: 11 Sept 2026
The most recent one with enough sample to compare. It is not «what this player is doing now».
U20 women's national teams · 2026 · Figures from that tournament (few games), not from a season. · 7 games with a box score
▸Coverage and source
7 games with a box score in the index · updated 11 Sept 2026 · Partial sample: not the full season nor a career total.
Percentile against the cohort on each metric: further out is better.
Cohort: U20 women's national teams 2026 · 213 players
▸How the comparison is made
≥5 games and ≥100 minutes
- 3P% 23.2 % — Cohort of 18: below the minimum of 20.
Age: 16.7 · 19 (n=208) · Δ -2.3
Every percentile is measured against the cohort declared beside it. A percentile without saying against whom means nothing.
League level context →116 indexed field-goal attempts in the box scores, across 7 games
▸See the full evidence
Evidence is picked by the dominant trait in the profile; it is not a dump. · U20 women's national teams 2026
Every figure states WHAT it counts and over which period: a total shot count and a three-point count are not the same thing.
- ✓116 indexed field-goal attempts in the box scores, across 7 gamesSource: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)
- ✓Shot split as published by the box score2 P · 60 attempts · 28/60 · 46.7 % · 51.7 % of volumeSource: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)
- ✓Shot split as published by the box score3 P · 56 attempts · 13/56 · 23.2 % · 48.3 % of volumeSource: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)
- ✓Free throws, kept apart: they are not field goals and do not enter the splitFree throws · 56 attempts · 40/56 · 71.4 %Source: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)
Shot chart: In this competition there is no visual with a verified frame.
- ✓What the box score publishes about the role (Primary creator)33 assists · 37 turnovers · 116 field-goal attempts · 7 GP · 219 MINSource: Scout index (box scores aggregated by season) (scout_player_season) · PERIOD: 2026 · COMPETITION: U20 women's national teams
- ✓Three-point shooting, with enough volume3 P · 56 attempts · 13/56 · 23.2 % · 48.3 % of volumeSource: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot) · PERIOD: 2026 · COMPETITION: U20 women's national teams
Plays
In this competition we have no video and no video locator. We do not have it, and we do not pretend to.
- !High shot volume (P97) with efficiency at P43: production comes from volume, not from accuracySource: cohort profile of the competition (scout_perfil_liga)
- !This season’s sample does not reach the comfortable minimumSource: cohort profile of the competition (scout_perfil_liga)
- !Limited sample: 7 games · 219′ · 56 three-point attempts. The percentage is not an equivalent signal to a large sample.Source: Scout index (box scores aggregated by season) (scout_player_season)
official roster of u20 womens eurobasket 2026 division b
Athleticism · strength · mobility: not measured. The only athletic-testing source in the system is the NBA Draft Combine. No NBA record is linked to this person with evidence: the Combine is matched through that link.
The routes (U16 women's national teams → U20 women's national teams) have no publishable comparison: the sample or the verified identity falls short of the minimum.
No accredited shot geometry for U20 women's national teams: a map that has not been measured is not drawn. The 2/3 split declared by the source is in the evidence.
Swipe to see all columns →
| Season | Team | Games | Minutes per game | Points per game | Rebounds per game | Assists per game | TS% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U20 women's national teams | 2026 | 🇳🇱NED | 7 | 31.2 | 19.3 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 48.0 % |
| U20 women's national teams | 2025 | 🇳🇱NED | 7 | 20.5 | 15.1 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 60.8 % |
| U16 women's national teams | 2024 | 🇳🇱NED | 7 | 32.1 | 21.3 | 6.6 | 4.4 | 48.6 % |
▸Material changes· 5
- U16 women's national teams 2024 → U20 women's national teams 2025 · Minutes per game -11.59 · competition change: the level changed too
- U16 women's national teams 2024 → U20 women's national teams 2025 · TS% +12.2 pp · competition change: the level changed too
- U20 women's national teams 2025 → U20 women's national teams 2026 · Minutes per game +10.74 · same competition
- U20 women's national teams 2025 → U20 women's national teams 2026 · TS% -12.8 pp · same competition
- U20 women's national teams 2025 → U20 women's national teams 2026 · Points per 40 -4.88 · same competition
U20 women's national teams 2026 · NED · Age 16.7
- ▸ Produces above the age cohort — Points per 40 24.71 · P91
- ▸ Creates above the age cohort — Assists per 40 6.04 · P89
- ▸ Young for the league and already has a role — Minutes per game 31.21 · P94 · Age 16.7 (P1)
▸Sample· 7 GP · 218.5 min
Cohort: U20 women's national teams 2026, age 15.2–18.2 (n=35)Limits of this signal: Short sample for the season · The signals describe what the box score measures; steals and blocks are not “defence” · An established player may show up: filter by age if you are after discovery
▸Suggested questions
The Analyst opens with this player and this scope already loaded.
🏠 Club according to the official FIBA roster of u20 womens eurobasket 2026 division b: Montverde Academy · USA · 185 cm · Guard
▸Not published on this profile: Physical profile · NBA Draft Combine · League level context · NBA Outlook· why
- Physical profile · NBA Draft Combine — No NBA record is linked to this person with evidence: the Combine is matched through that link.
- League level context — The routes (U16 women's national teams → U20 women's national teams) have no publishable comparison: the sample or the verified identity falls short of the minimum.
- NBA Outlook — The NBA Outlook only covers draft board prospects with an NCAA record.
Modules with no data for this player, with the reason. These are not zeros.
▸Methodology, sources and limits
▸League level context· The routes (U16 women's national teams → U20 women's national teams) have no publishable comparison: the sample or the verified identity falls short of the minimum.
The routes (U16 women's national teams → U20 women's national teams) have no publishable comparison: the sample or the verified identity falls short of the minimum.
▸What we do not show, and why
- usg_pct — It only exists at career level; as a season figure it is not that.
- ast_pct — It only exists at career level.
- orb_pct — It only exists at career level.
- drb_pct — It only exists at career level.
- League level context — The routes (U16 women's national teams → U20 women's national teams) have no publishable comparison: the sample or the verified identity falls short of the minimum.
- NBA Outlook — The NBA Outlook only covers draft board prospects with an NCAA record.
- Physical profile · NBA Draft Combine — No NBA record is linked to this person with evidence: the Combine is matched through that link.
This dossier does not score the player. Ranking prospects with this data was measured to have no signal, so no score is invented.
Identity: eje_comun · Source: official FIBA roster (fiba_roster)