SportiveWorld
KB
Not verified
Position · Age · Physical · Country
🇬🇧
Great Britain
U16 national teams · 2026
Tournament
PTS
5.1
P25
REB
3.7
P63
AST
0.6
P9
MIN
17.6
P21
GP
7
Scout summary
Strength
Protects the rim above the cohort
P82 · 1.3 Blocks per 40
Risk
Creates offense among the weakest in the cohort
P9 · 1.3 Assists per 40
What to check next
Watch their passing reads and pick-and-roll
P9 · 1.3 Assists per 40
▸See 4 more
  • Age: the record carries no date of birth.
  • Height and weight: no roster with declared provenance.
  • Nationality: not present in the source.
  • 3 of 9 metrics have no publishable comparison in this cohort.
Context and coverage
Latest indexed trace
Latest indexed season
▸About this sample
Latest indexed trace
🇬🇧
Great Britain
U16 national teams · 2026

Current team: cannot be proven from the index. What you see is the latest trace and the last known club, not today's confirmation.

From the U16 national teams 2026 box score · newest the index has for that competition: 2026 · index updated: 11 Sept 2026

Season analysed
Tournament
Team in that tournament
🇬🇧
Great Britain
U16 national teams · 2026

The most recent one with enough sample to compare. It is not «what this player is doing now».

Production

U16 national teams · 2026 · Figures from that tournament (few games), not from a season. · 7 games with a box score

TS%
—
eFG%
—
3P%
—
Turnover %
—
Assist to turnover
—
Starts
0
▸Coverage and source

7 games with a box score in the index · updated 11 Sept 2026 · Partial sample: not the full season nor a career total.

Against the cohort
Profile fingerprint
MIN P21PTS/40 P25AST/40 P9REB/40 P63STL/40 P63BLK/40 P82huella: MIN P21 · PTS/40 P25 · AST/40 P9 · REB/40 P63 · STL/40 P63 · BLK/40 P82

Percentile against the cohort on each metric: further out is better.

Total minutes
123.0
P21
Points per 40
11.7
P25
Assists per 40
1.3
P9
Rebounds per 40
8.5
P63
Steals per 40
2.6
P63
Blocks per 40
1.3
P82

Cohort: U16 national teams 2026 · 333 players

▸How the comparison is made

≥5 games and ≥100 minutes

  • TS% — The box score does not publish this metric for this player.
  • 3P% — The box score does not publish this metric for this player.
  • Assist to turnover — The box score does not publish this metric for this player.

Without a date of birth there is no age to compare.

Every percentile is measured against the cohort declared beside it. A percentile without saying against whom means nothing.

League level context →
The proof
7
games with box score
123
minutes
0
as starter
U16 national teams · 2026 · source: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot) · indexed 11 Sept 2026 · sufficient sample

40 indexed field-goal attempts in the box scores, across 7 games

2 P · 10/19 · 52.6 %3 P · 3/21 · 14.3 %Free throws · 7/17 · 41.2 %
✓ 1 piece of evidence supports it! 2 cast doubt on it
▸See the full evidence

Evidence is picked by the dominant trait in the profile; it is not a dump. · U16 national teams 2026

Every figure states WHAT it counts and over which period: a total shot count and a three-point count are not the same thing.

What the box score publishes
Dataseason 2026
  • ✓40 indexed field-goal attempts in the box scores, across 7 gamesSource: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)
  • ✓Shot split as published by the box score2 P · 19 attempts · 10/19 · 52.6 % · 47.5 % of volumeSource: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)
  • ✓Shot split as published by the box score3 P · 21 attempts · 3/21 · 14.3 % · 52.5 % of volumeSource: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)
  • ✓Free throws, kept apart: they are not field goals and do not enter the splitFree throws · 17 attempts · 7/17 · 41.2 %Source: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)

Shot chart: In this competition there is no visual with a verified frame.

Evidence that supports this evaluation
  • ✓What the box score publishes about the role (Shot blocker)4 blocks · 26 rebounds · 7 GP · 123 MINSource: Scout index (box scores aggregated by season) (scout_player_season) · PERIOD: 2026 · COMPETITION: U16 national teams

Plays

In this competition we have no video and no video locator. We do not have it, and we do not pretend to.

Evidence that raises doubt
  • !This season’s sample does not reach the comfortable minimumSource: cohort profile of the competition (scout_perfil_liga)
  • !Limited sample: 7 games · 123′ · 21 three-point attempts. The percentage is not an equivalent signal to a large sample.Source: Scout index (box scores aggregated by season) (scout_player_season)
Physical tools

Height · Weight: Not verified · Athleticism · strength · mobility: not measured. The only athletic-testing source in the system is the NBA Draft Combine. No NBA record is linked to this person with evidence: the Combine is matched through that link.

Fit & translation
Open question

At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.

Shot profile

No accredited shot geometry for U16 national teams: a map that has not been measured is not drawn. The 2/3 split declared by the source is in the evidence.

My follow-up
…
▸Suggested questions
Scout notebook
…
▸Not published on this profile: How this player is changing · Why this player is on the Radar · Physical profile · NBA Draft Combine · League level context · NBA Outlook· why
  • How this player is changing — Only one indexed season: there is no evolution to measure.
  • Why this player is on the Radar — No Radar signal in U16 national teams: either none is triggered, or the competition is not covered by the Radar.
  • Physical profile · NBA Draft Combine — No NBA record is linked to this person with evidence: the Combine is matched through that link.
  • League level context — At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.
  • NBA Outlook — The NBA Outlook only covers draft board prospects with an NCAA record.

Modules with no data for this player, with the reason. These are not zeros.

▸Methodology, sources and limits
▸League level context· At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.

At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.

▸What we do not show, and why
  • usg_pct — It only exists at career level; as a season figure it is not that.
  • ast_pct — It only exists at career level.
  • orb_pct — It only exists at career level.
  • drb_pct — It only exists at career level.
  • How this player is changing — Only one indexed season: there is no evolution to measure.
  • Why this player is on the Radar — No Radar signal in U16 national teams: either none is triggered, or the competition is not covered by the Radar.
  • League level context — At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.
  • NBA Outlook — The NBA Outlook only covers draft board prospects with an NCAA record.
  • Physical profile · NBA Draft Combine — No NBA record is linked to this person with evidence: the Combine is matched through that link.

This dossier does not score the player. Ranking prospects with this data was measured to have no signal, so no score is invented.

Identity: eje_comun