Scouting dossier · SportiveWorld Scout

Milos Knezevic

Position: —Age today: no verified date of birthPhysical: Not verifiedNationality: Not verified

Montenegro

U16 national teams · 2026

TournamentProfessional report · Generated 2026-09-25

Summary

What the index measures, in three lines. The scout's observations are kept apart, always labelled.

▲ Strengths: Does not stand above P80 in any metric of the cohort (best: Assists per 40, P79)
▼ Concerns: Rebounds per 40 · P3 in the cohort (U16 national teams 2026, n=333)
● Sample: 7 GP · 219′ · U16 national teams 2026 · Cohort n=333 · OK

Market: unknown. This report makes no claim about anyone's contract, availability or cost; we do not have them.

Performance profile

Percentile against the cohort on each metric: further out is better.

Position in the cohort · n=333

Points per 40 17.6P63

Rebounds per 40 2.9P3

Assists per 40 5.5P79

TS% 51.9 %P64

Fit with the need

This report was opened without a need (level and role). Open it from a list or from the need to see the fit.

Market feasibility: Unknown — We have no contract, availability or cost. Without those three, nobody is signable, and this product will not claim otherwise: the five are SPORTING CANDIDATES.

Identity

U16 national teams 2026 · MNE · 7 GP · 219′

Role / archetype

Rotation role

…

Offense

Points per 4017.6
P63n=333
TS%51.9 %
P64n=180
3P%—
—
Assists per 405.5
P79n=333
Assist to turnover1.1
P68n=253

13.7 PPG · 4.3 APG · TS 51.9 % · eFG 49.4 %

…

Defense

Rebounds per 402.9
P3n=333
Steals per 401.1
P14n=333
Blocks per 400.2
P29n=333

2.3 RPG

…

Physical

Not published: the source does not have it for this player.

…

Strengths

Does not stand above P80 in any metric of the cohort (best: Assists per 40, P79)

…

Concerns

Rebounds per 40 · P3 in the cohort (U16 national teams 2026, n=333)

▸ Age: the record carries no date of birth.
▸ Height and weight: no roster with declared provenance.
▸ Nationality: not present in the source.

…

Evidence

U16 national teams 2026 · season

▪ 82 indexed field-goal attempts in the box scores, across 7 games · Source: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)

▪ Shot split as published by the box score · 2 P · 51 attempts · 24/51 · 47.1 % · 62.2 % of volume · Source: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)

▪ Shot split as published by the box score · 3 P · 31 attempts · 11/31 · 35.5 % · 37.8 % of volume · Source: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)

▪ Free throws, kept apart: they are not field goals and do not enter the split · Free throws · 24 attempts · 15/24 · 62.5 % · Source: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)

Shot chart: In this competition there is no visual with a verified frame.

⚠ This season’s sample does not reach the comfortable minimum · Source: cohort profile of the competition (scout_perfil_liga)

⚠ Limited sample: 7 games · 219′ · 31 three-point attempts. The percentage is not an equivalent signal to a large sample. · Source: Scout index (box scores aggregated by season) (scout_player_season)

Shot profile

No accredited shot geometry for U16 national teams: a map that has not been measured is not drawn. The 2/3 split declared by the source is in the evidence.

Trajectory

Only one indexed season: there is no evolution to measure.

Level translation

At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.

Confidence and sample

Sample: 7 GP · 219′ · OK · n=333

Index as of 2026-09-11

Market

Market feasibility: Unknown

Representation, availability and eligibility: NOT verified. This report neither asserts nor assumes them; the announced team and the history come from dated sources and are cited as such.

Provenance

• Season statistics, computed from each competition’s official box score
• Cohort profile: role, strengths and risks as percentiles within the competition and season
• Shot and play-by-play evidence: shot data from each competition’s official source (FIBA, EuroLeague, ACB, WNBA and NBA shot zones)
• Observations and video: private to the scout, provenance declared by the scout