SportiveWorldSportiveWorld

FORECAST · WNBA

CHI @ CON

Chicago Sky · Connecticut Sun · Wednesday, 26 August 2026 at 01:00

MissedPreview saved before the gameAs of 25 Aug

What Forecast expects · Favourite

59%CHIchance to win
CON · 41.2%58.8% · CHI
  • CHI starts with a 58.8% chance to win; CON with 41.2%.
  • In games: out of 10 like this one, CHI would win 6 and CON 4.

Confidence

medium
  • Research-stage model: shown as what it said before tip-off, not as an advantage.
  • The model does not know this game's injuries or starting five.

Why

  • The model looks at only two things: each team's accumulated season strength and home court.
  • Home court is worth 4.6 probability points to CON.
  • CHI comes in with the stronger accumulated season form: that moves 13.4 points toward CHI.

What weighs most

Home court+4.6 toward CON
Season strength+13.4 toward CHI

probability points

What could flip it

  • The model does not read the injury report and has no players inside it: an absence would change the game without changing this number. There is no calculation saying by how much.
  • What the model does not look at and this number does not capture: rest and travel, the day's injury report, the starting five and recent form.

Uncertainty

  • The model gives a number, not a band: its reliability is measured by comparing forecasts with results, not by drawing a margin.
  • It does not know injuries, rest, travel or the starting five: any of them can move this game without the number changing.
  • For reference, the pre-tip market consensus gave CON 30.0%.

What changed since the last snapshot

Loading

After the game

CHI 59%
Expected
CON 87 – CHI 81
Actual
0.35
this game's error
  • Expected: CHI at 58.8%.
  • Actual: CON 87 – CHI 81. CON won.
  • The model picked the wrong side.
  • This game's error: 0.35 (0 = nailed it, 1 = worst possible; a 50% call would score 0.25).
  • The market consensus (30.0% on the winner) also picked the wrong side.
  • What we learn: on this game the model was closer to the result than the market consensus. One game is not a sample.

Is it calibrated?

49
games measured
76%
accuracy
0.172
error (Brier)
market 0.169
12 pp
average deviation (ECE)
  • Over 49 settled games with this model: it picked the right side 76% of the time and its average error (Brier) was 0.172. When it said X%, reality was on average 12 points away from that X%.
  • On those same games, the market consensus had less error (0.169 versus 0.172): the model does not beat it, and we say so.
  • 49 games is a small sample: these numbers still move a lot.

How it is measured and limits

Model

SportiveWorld's WNBA game model, research stage: it reads each team's accumulated season strength and home-court advantage. Shown as what it said before tip-off, not as an edge.

This is the preview saved before the game, not current data.

Sample · Measured against 49 settled games.

Injuries · Availability known before tip-off: an injury report existed and was read (it does not enter the number).

  • · What you see is the preview sealed before the game, not a later recalculation.
  • · 49 games is a small sample: these numbers still move a lot.

As of 25 Aug · SportiveWorld model

Verified against the source · 13/13
  • expected competition and game
  • home and away
  • probability intact
  • favourite = higher probability
  • sealed and signed snapshot
  • registered model
  • sealed before tip-off
  • consistent official result
  • core verified by the server
  • verified components
  • numbers add up
  • freshness without contradiction
  • consistent track record

This is reading the data, not a bet: we work with no bookmakers and show no odds. And a game turns on an injury, a hot night or a bad call.