SportiveWorldSportiveWorld

FORECAST · WNBA

POR @ LA

Portland Fire · Los Angeles Sparks · Monday, 21 September 2026 at 01:00

CorrectPreview saved before the gameAs of 20 Sept

What Forecast expects · Favourite

55%LAchance to win
LA · 55.3%44.7% · POR
  • LA starts with a 55.3% chance to win; POR with 44.7%.
  • In games: out of 10 like this one, LA would win 6 and POR 4.

Confidence

low
  • The model has it close to 50-50: either result would be normal.
  • Research-stage model: shown as what it said before tip-off, not as an advantage.
  • The model does not know this game's injuries or starting five.

Why

  • The model looks at only two things: each team's accumulated season strength and home court.
  • Home court is worth 4.4 probability points to LA.
  • Both teams' accumulated season strength is even: home court decides.

What weighs most

Home court+4.4 toward LA
Season strength+0.9 toward LA

probability points

What could flip it

  • The model does not read the injury report and has no players inside it: an absence would change the game without changing this number. There is no calculation saying by how much.
  • What the model does not look at and this number does not capture: rest and travel, the day's injury report, the starting five and recent form.

Uncertainty

  • The model gives a number, not a band: its reliability is measured by comparing forecasts with results, not by drawing a margin.
  • It does not know injuries, rest, travel or the starting five: any of them can move this game without the number changing.
  • For reference, the pre-tip market consensus gave LA 51.0%.

What changed since the last snapshot

Loading

After the game

LA 55%
Expected
LA 105 – POR 84
Actual
0.20
this game's error
  • Expected: LA at 55.3%.
  • Actual: LA 105 – POR 84. LA won.
  • The favorite delivered.
  • This game's error: 0.20 (0 = nailed it, 1 = worst possible; a 50% call would score 0.25).
  • The market consensus did get the side right (51.0% on the winner).
  • What we learn: it was a coin flip for the model; the result says little about it.

Is it calibrated?

47
games measured
74%
accuracy
0.173
error (Brier)
market 0.172
13 pp
average deviation (ECE)
  • Over 47 settled games with this model: it picked the right side 74% of the time and its average error (Brier) was 0.173. When it said X%, reality was on average 13 points away from that X%.
  • On those same games, the market consensus had less error (0.172 versus 0.173): the model does not beat it, and we say so.
  • 47 games is a small sample: these numbers still move a lot.

How it is measured and limits

Model

SportiveWorld's WNBA game model, research stage: it reads each team's accumulated season strength and home-court advantage. Shown as what it said before tip-off, not as an edge.

This is the preview saved before the game, not current data.

Sample · Measured against 47 settled games.

Injuries · Availability known before tip-off: an injury report existed and was read (it does not enter the number).

  • · What you see is the preview sealed before the game, not a later recalculation.
  • · 47 games is a small sample: these numbers still move a lot.

As of 20 Sept · SportiveWorld model

Verified against the source · 13/13
  • expected competition and game
  • home and away
  • probability intact
  • favourite = higher probability
  • sealed and signed snapshot
  • registered model
  • sealed before tip-off
  • consistent official result
  • core verified by the server
  • verified components
  • numbers add up
  • freshness without contradiction
  • consistent track record

This is reading the data, not a bet: we work with no bookmakers and show no odds. And a game turns on an injury, a hot night or a bad call.