Professional DNA

David Lee: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Finishing at the rim · 2016-17 · 79 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2016-17

The question

What kind of player is David Lee?

The evidence

David Lee · Finishing at the rim: 87th percentile (69.8 % · 235 attempts)

87 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+37) · 413 players with a sample in 2016-17

David Lee: what moved most is Scoring

49 percentilcompared against: 95 percentil (-46) · David Lee, from 2011-12 to 2014-15

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 18.7 minutes per game across 79 games
What sets them apartFinishing at the rim · 87th percentile
69.8 % · 235 attempts

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 413 players with a sample in 2016-17. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring47th percentile
7.3 points per game
Playmaking54th percentile
1.6 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact83th percentile
DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rim87th percentile
69.8 % · 235 attempts
Rebounding80th percentile
5.6 rebounds per game

Strengths

Finishing at the rim87th percentile
Very high · 69.8 % · 235 attempts
Defensive impact83th percentile
Very high · DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Rebounding80th percentile
Very high · 5.6 rebounds per game

Limitations

Scoring47th percentile
Average · 7.3 points per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.
See Tracking →

Recent change

Scoring: 96th percentile → 47th percentile (-49) · Playmaking: 78th percentile → 54th percentile (-24) · Rebounding: 96th percentile → 80th percentile (-16)

2011-1296th percentile
57 games · 37.2 minutes per game
Scoring
96th percentile
Playmaking
78th percentile
Rebounding
96th percentile
2012-1396th percentile
79 games · 36.8 minutes per game
Scoring
96th percentile
Playmaking
83th percentile
Rebounding
99th percentile
2013-1493th percentile
69 games · 33.2 minutes per game
Scoring
93th percentile
Playmaking
68th percentile
Rebounding
95th percentile
2014-1551th percentile
49 games · 18.4 minutes per game
Scoring
51th percentile
Playmaking
57th percentile
Rebounding
76th percentile
2015-1650th percentile
55 games · 16.4 minutes per game
Scoring
50th percentile
Playmaking
50th percentile
Rebounding
79th percentile
2016-1747th percentile
79 games · 18.7 minutes per game
Scoring
47th percentile
Playmaking
54th percentile
Rebounding
80th percentile

Context

2016-17 · 79 games · 18.7 minutes per game · Percentile against 413 measured players in 2016-17 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2016-17 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-12

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.