Professional DNA

Tim Duncan: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2015-16 · 61 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2015-16

The question

What kind of player is Tim Duncan?

The evidence

Tim Duncan · Defensive impact: 99th percentile (DBPM 3.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

99 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+49) · 414 players with a sample in 2015-16

Tim Duncan: what moved most is Scoring

55 percentilcompared against: 86 percentil (-31) · Tim Duncan, from 2010-11 to 2015-16

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleFull rotation: 25.2 minutes per game across 61 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 99th percentile
DBPM 3.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 414 players with a sample in 2015-16. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring55th percentile
8.6 points per game
Playmaking77th percentile
2.7 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact99th percentile
DBPM 3.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rim36th percentile
56.4 % · 156 attempts
Rebounding89th percentile
7.3 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact99th percentile
Elite · DBPM 3.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Rebounding89th percentile
Very high · 7.3 rebounds per game
Playmaking77th percentile
Very high · 2.7 assists per game

Limitations

Finishing at the rim36th percentile
Low · 56.4 % · 156 attempts
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.
See Tracking →

Recent change

Scoring: 80th percentile → 55th percentile (-25) · Playmaking: 78th percentile → 77th percentile (-1) · Rebounding: 95th percentile → 89th percentile (-6)

2010-1180th percentile
76 games · 28.4 minutes per game
Scoring
80th percentile
Playmaking
78th percentile
Rebounding
95th percentile
2011-1288th percentile
58 games · 28.2 minutes per game
Scoring
88th percentile
Playmaking
71th percentile
Rebounding
96th percentile
2012-1394th percentile
69 games · 30.1 minutes per game
Scoring
94th percentile
Playmaking
75th percentile
Rebounding
97th percentile
2013-1485th percentile
74 games · 29.2 minutes per game
Scoring
85th percentile
Playmaking
79th percentile
Rebounding
97th percentile
2014-1582th percentile
77 games · 28.9 minutes per game
Scoring
82th percentile
Playmaking
78th percentile
Rebounding
96th percentile
2015-1655th percentile
61 games · 25.2 minutes per game
Scoring
55th percentile
Playmaking
77th percentile
Rebounding
89th percentile

Context

2015-16 · 61 games · 25.2 minutes per game · Percentile against 414 measured players in 2015-16 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2015-16 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-12

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.