SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Hakeem Olajuwon: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2001-02 · 61 games

99

percentil

Hakeem Olajuwon
Confidence: lowData through: 2001-02

The question

What kind of player is Hakeem Olajuwon?

The evidence

Hakeem Olajuwon · Defensive impact: 99th percentile (DBPM 2.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

99 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+49) · 379 players with a sample in 2001-02

Hakeem Olajuwon: what moved most is Scoring

48 percentilcompared against: 85 percentil (-37) · Hakeem Olajuwon, from 1996-97 to 2001-02

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleFull rotation: 22.6 minutes per game across 61 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 99th percentile

    DBPM 2.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 379 players with a sample in 2001-02. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring48th percentile

    7.1 points per game

  • Playmaking37th percentile

    1.1 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact99th percentile

    DBPM 2.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding82th percentile

    6.0 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact99th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 2.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Rebounding82th percentile

    Very high · 6.0 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Scoring48th percentile

    Average · 7.1 points per game

  • Playmaking37th percentile

    Low · 1.1 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 98th percentile → 48th percentile (-50) · Playmaking: 77th percentile → 37th percentile (-40) · Rebounding: 94th percentile → 82th percentile (-12)

  • 1996-9798th percentile

    78 games · 36.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    98th percentile
    Playmaking
    77th percentile
    Rebounding
    94th percentile
  • 1997-9889th percentile

    47 games · 34.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    89th percentile
    Playmaking
    78th percentile
    Rebounding
    96th percentile
  • 1998-9995th percentile

    50 games · 35.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    95th percentile
    Playmaking
    59th percentile
    Rebounding
    95th percentile
  • 1999-0068th percentile

    44 games · 23.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    68th percentile
    Playmaking
    49th percentile
    Rebounding
    81th percentile
  • 2000-0176th percentile

    58 games · 26.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    76th percentile
    Playmaking
    42th percentile
    Rebounding
    89th percentile
  • 2001-0248th percentile

    61 games · 22.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    48th percentile
    Playmaking
    37th percentile
    Rebounding
    82th percentile

Context

2001-02 · 61 games · 22.6 minutes per game · Percentile against 379 measured players in 2001-02 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2001-02 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-12

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.