SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Bob Lanier: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1983-84 · 72 games

84

percentil

Bob Lanier
Confidence: lowData through: 1983-84

The question

What kind of player is Bob Lanier?

The evidence

Bob Lanier · Defensive impact: 84th percentile (DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

84 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+34) · 278 players with a sample in 1983-84

Bob Lanier: what moved most is Scoring

71 percentilcompared against: 93 percentil (-22) · Bob Lanier, from 1978-79 to 1980-81

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleFull rotation: 27.9 minutes per game across 72 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 84th percentile

    DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 278 players with a sample in 1983-84. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring75th percentile

    13.6 points per game

  • Playmaking66th percentile

    2.6 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact84th percentile

    DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding81th percentile

    6.3 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact84th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Rebounding81th percentile

    Very high · 6.3 rebounds per game

  • Scoring75th percentile

    Very high · 13.6 points per game

Limitations

No measured axis falls below his league's median. What follows are the limits of the read, not weak spots in the player.

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 96th percentile → 75th percentile (-21) · Playmaking: 62th percentile → 66th percentile (+4) · Rebounding: 92th percentile → 81th percentile (-11)

  • 1978-7996th percentile

    53 games · 34.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    96th percentile
    Playmaking
    62th percentile
    Rebounding
    92th percentile
  • 1979-8089th percentile

    63 games · 33.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    89th percentile
    Playmaking
    65th percentile
    Rebounding
    92th percentile
  • 1980-8174th percentile

    67 games · 26.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    74th percentile
    Playmaking
    63th percentile
    Rebounding
    78th percentile
  • 1981-8274th percentile

    74 games · 26.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    74th percentile
    Playmaking
    73th percentile
    Rebounding
    70th percentile
  • 1982-8362th percentile

    39 games · 25.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    62th percentile
    Playmaking
    67th percentile
    Rebounding
    69th percentile
  • 1983-8475th percentile

    72 games · 27.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    75th percentile
    Playmaking
    66th percentile
    Rebounding
    81th percentile

Context

1983-84 · 72 games · 27.9 minutes per game · Percentile against 278 measured players in 1983-84 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1983-84 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-12

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.