Professional DNA

Kevin Garnett: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2015-16 · 38 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2015-16

The question

What kind of player is Kevin Garnett?

The evidence

Kevin Garnett · Defensive impact: 99th percentile (DBPM 3.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

99 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+49) · 414 players with a sample in 2015-16

Kevin Garnett: what moved most is Scoring

32 percentilcompared against: 87 percentil (-55) · Kevin Garnett, from 2010-11 to 2013-14

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 14.6 minutes per game across 38 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 99th percentile
DBPM 3.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 414 players with a sample in 2015-16. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring10th percentile
3.2 points per game
Playmaking54th percentile
1.6 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact99th percentile
DBPM 3.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding61th percentile
3.9 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact99th percentile
Elite · DBPM 3.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

Scoring10th percentile
Very low · 3.2 points per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.
See Tracking →

Recent change

Scoring: 84th percentile → 10th percentile (-74) · Playmaking: 73th percentile → 54th percentile (-19) · Rebounding: 95th percentile → 61th percentile (-34)

2010-1184th percentile
71 games · 31.3 minutes per game
Scoring
84th percentile
Playmaking
73th percentile
Rebounding
95th percentile
2011-1290th percentile
60 games · 31.1 minutes per game
Scoring
90th percentile
Playmaking
80th percentile
Rebounding
94th percentile
2012-1386th percentile
68 games · 29.7 minutes per game
Scoring
86th percentile
Playmaking
69th percentile
Rebounding
92th percentile
2013-1442th percentile
54 games · 20.5 minutes per game
Scoring
42th percentile
Playmaking
53th percentile
Rebounding
87th percentile
2014-1543th percentile
47 games · 20.3 minutes per game
Scoring
43th percentile
Playmaking
55th percentile
Rebounding
87th percentile
2015-1610th percentile
38 games · 14.6 minutes per game
Scoring
10th percentile
Playmaking
54th percentile
Rebounding
61th percentile

Context

2015-16 · 38 games · 14.6 minutes per game · Percentile against 414 measured players in 2015-16 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2015-16 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-13

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.