SportiveWorld

What if…?

Without Jericho Sims, Milwaukee Bucks were 7.2 points per game better

66 games with him · 16 without, in 2025-26

7.2

points per game

Jericho Sims
Confidence: mediumData through: 2025-26

The question

What would have changed if Jericho Sims had not played?

The evidence

Without Jericho Sims, Milwaukee Bucks were 7.2 points per game better

-0.38 points per gamecompared against: -7.62 points per game (+7.24 · +95 %) · With Jericho Sims in the box score

The fact

What actually happened, game by game, in 2025-26. None of this is an estimate.

With Jericho Sims in the box score

-7.62 points per game

66 games · 25-41 · 110.0 – 117.6

Without him

-0.38 points per game

16 games · 7-9 · 113.2 – 113.6

The assumptions

What we decided in order to answer. If an assumption does not hold for you, neither does the answer.

  • That the 16 games without him represent a whole season without him.
  • That opponent quality is spread evenly across both groups. We have not controlled for it.
  • That other absences do not systematically coincide with his.

The estimated result

Arithmetic on the two figures above, nothing else: the per-game difference carried over a 82-game season.

  • points of margin per game+7.24
  • Across 82 games that is +594 points of accumulated margin.

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • This does not say he is the cause. A team without its best player also changes rotation, opponent and schedule at the same time.
  • It rests on 16 games without him. At that sample size, a couple of odd games move the number.
  • It is not a forecast for next season: it is what happened in the one already played.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

2026-04-12

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-12

Where this comes from

Box scores · closed season · its clock is the seasonGame results · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.