Julius Sutton
Professional report →▸See 4 more
- Age: the record carries no date of birth.
- Height and weight: no roster with declared provenance.
- Nationality: not present in the source.
- 1 of 9 metrics have no publishable comparison in this cohort.
▸About this sample
Current team: cannot be proven from the index. What you see is the latest trace and the last known club, not today's confirmation.
From the U16 national teams 2026 box score · newest the index has for that competition: 2026 · index updated: 11 Sept 2026
The most recent one with enough sample to compare. It is not «what this player is doing now».
U16 national teams · 2026 · Figures from that tournament (few games), not from a season. · 7 games with a box score
▸Coverage and source
7 games with a box score in the index · updated 11 Sept 2026 · Partial sample: not the full season nor a career total.
Percentile against the cohort on each metric: further out is better.
Cohort: U16 national teams 2026 · 333 players
▸How the comparison is made
≥5 games and ≥100 minutes
- 3P% — The box score does not publish this metric for this player.
Without a date of birth there is no age to compare.
Every percentile is measured against the cohort declared beside it. A percentile without saying against whom means nothing.
League level context →56 indexed field-goal attempts in the box scores, across 7 games
▸See the full evidence
Evidence is picked by the dominant trait in the profile; it is not a dump. · U16 national teams 2026
Every figure states WHAT it counts and over which period: a total shot count and a three-point count are not the same thing.
- ✓56 indexed field-goal attempts in the box scores, across 7 gamesSource: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)
- ✓Shot split as published by the box score2 P · 43 attempts · 18/43 · 41.9 % · 76.8 % of volumeSource: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)
- ✓Shot split as published by the box score3 P · 13 attempts · 4/13 · 30.8 % · 23.2 % of volumeSource: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)
- ✓Free throws, kept apart: they are not field goals and do not enter the splitFree throws · 14 attempts · 11/14 · 78.6 %Source: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)
Shot chart: In this competition there is no visual with a verified frame.
The dominant trait has no specific proof beyond what the box score publishes, above.
Plays
In this competition we have no video and no video locator. We do not have it, and we do not pretend to.
- !This season’s sample does not reach the comfortable minimumSource: cohort profile of the competition (scout_perfil_liga)
- !Limited sample: 7 games · 141′ · 13 three-point attempts. The percentage is not an equivalent signal to a large sample.Source: Scout index (box scores aggregated by season) (scout_player_season)
Height · Weight: Not verified · Athleticism · strength · mobility: not measured. The only athletic-testing source in the system is the NBA Draft Combine. No NBA record is linked to this person with evidence: the Combine is matched through that link.
At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.
No accredited shot geometry for U16 national teams: a map that has not been measured is not drawn. The 2/3 split declared by the source is in the evidence.
▸Suggested questions
The Analyst opens with this player and this scope already loaded.
▸Not published on this profile: How this player is changing · Why this player is on the Radar · Physical profile · NBA Draft Combine · League level context · NBA Outlook· why
- How this player is changing — Only one indexed season: there is no evolution to measure.
- Why this player is on the Radar — No Radar signal in U16 national teams: either none is triggered, or the competition is not covered by the Radar.
- Physical profile · NBA Draft Combine — No NBA record is linked to this person with evidence: the Combine is matched through that link.
- League level context — At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.
- NBA Outlook — The NBA Outlook only covers draft board prospects with an NCAA record.
Modules with no data for this player, with the reason. These are not zeros.
▸Methodology, sources and limits
▸League level context· At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.
At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.
▸What we do not show, and why
- usg_pct — It only exists at career level; as a season figure it is not that.
- ast_pct — It only exists at career level.
- orb_pct — It only exists at career level.
- drb_pct — It only exists at career level.
- How this player is changing — Only one indexed season: there is no evolution to measure.
- Why this player is on the Radar — No Radar signal in U16 national teams: either none is triggered, or the competition is not covered by the Radar.
- League level context — At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.
- NBA Outlook — The NBA Outlook only covers draft board prospects with an NCAA record.
- Physical profile · NBA Draft Combine — No NBA record is linked to this person with evidence: the Combine is matched through that link.
This dossier does not score the player. Ranking prospects with this data was measured to have no signal, so no score is invented.
Identity: eje_comun