SportiveWorld
JS

Josef Svoboda🇨🇿

Professional report →
Position
Shooting guard
Age
20 yrs · 19.1 in 2025 · born 2005-12-28
Physical
195.0 cmofficial roster of u20 eurobasket 2025
Country
🇨🇿 Czechia
🇨🇿
Czechia
U20 national teams · 2025
Tournament
PTS
11.4
P86
REB
4.1
P59
AST
2.6
P78
MIN
21.4
P52
GP
7
Scout summary
Strength
Gets steals among the best in the cohort
P94 · 3.5 Steals per 40
Risk
Protects the rim among the weakest in the cohort
P0 · 0.0 Blocks per 40
What to check next
Watch their timing protecting the rim
P0 · 0.0 Blocks per 40
Context and coverage
Latest indexed trace
Old trace
▸About this sample
Latest indexed trace
🇨🇿
Czechia
U20 national teams · 2025

Current team: cannot be proven from the index. What you see is the latest trace and the last known club, not today's confirmation.

no se puede verificar dónde está hoy: su rastro más reciente es U20 national teams 2025 y esa competición ya tiene 2026 en el índice

Season analysed
Tournament
Team in that tournament
🇨🇿
Czechia
U20 national teams · 2025

The most recent one with enough sample to compare. It is not «what this player is doing now».

Production

U20 national teams · 2025 · Figures from that tournament (few games), not from a season. · 7 games with a box score

TS%
48.4 %
eFG%
45.9 %
3P%
28.8 %
Turnover %
11.7 %
Assist to turnover
1.6
Starts
7
▸Coverage and source

7 games with a box score in the index · updated 11 Sept 2026 · Partial sample: not the full season nor a career total.

Against the cohort
Profile fingerprint
MIN P52PTS/40 P86TS% P403P% P45AST/40 P78AST/TO P85REB/40 P59STL/40 P94BLK/40 P0huella: MIN P52 · PTS/40 P86 · TS% P40 · 3P% P45 · AST/40 P78 · AST/TO P85 · REB/40 P59 · STL/40 P94 · BLK/40 P0

Percentile against the cohort on each metric: further out is better.

Total minutes
149.9
P52
Points per 40
21.4
P86
TS%
48.4 %
P40
3P%
28.8 %
P45
Assists per 40
4.8
P78
Assist to turnover
1.6
P85
Rebounds per 40
7.7
P59
Steals per 40
3.5
P94
Blocks per 40
0.0
P0

Cohort: U20 national teams 2025 · 275 players

▸How the comparison is made

≥5 games and ≥100 minutes

Age: 19.1 · 19.4 (n=264) · Δ -0.3

Every percentile is measured against the cohort declared beside it. A percentile without saying against whom means nothing.

League level context →
The proof
7
games with box score
150
minutes
7
as starter
U20 national teams · 2025 · source: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot) · indexed 11 Sept 2026 · sufficient sample

73 indexed field-goal attempts in the box scores, across 7 games

2 P · 11/21 · 52.4 %3 P · 15/52 · 28.8 %Free throws · 13/22 · 59.1 %
✓ 2 pieces of evidence support it! 3 cast doubt on it
▸See the full evidence

Evidence is picked by the dominant trait in the profile; it is not a dump. · U20 national teams 2025

Every figure states WHAT it counts and over which period: a total shot count and a three-point count are not the same thing.

What the box score publishes
Dataseason 2025
  • ✓73 indexed field-goal attempts in the box scores, across 7 gamesSource: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)
  • ✓Shot split as published by the box score2 P · 21 attempts · 11/21 · 52.4 % · 28.8 % of volumeSource: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)
  • ✓Shot split as published by the box score3 P · 52 attempts · 15/52 · 28.8 % · 71.2 % of volumeSource: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)
  • ✓Free throws, kept apart: they are not field goals and do not enter the splitFree throws · 22 attempts · 13/22 · 59.1 %Source: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot)

Shot chart: In this competition there is no visual with a verified frame.

Evidence that supports this evaluation
  • ✓What the box score publishes about the role (Volume scorer)80 points · 73 field-goal attempts · 7 GP · 150 MINSource: Scout index (box scores aggregated by season) (scout_player_season) · PERIOD: 2025 · COMPETITION: U20 national teams
  • ✓Three-point shooting, with enough volume3 P · 52 attempts · 15/52 · 28.8 % · 71.2 % of volumeSource: official FIBA box-score shots (fiba_shot) · PERIOD: 2025 · COMPETITION: U20 national teams

Plays

In this competition we have no video and no video locator. We do not have it, and we do not pretend to.

Evidence that raises doubt
  • !High shot volume (P93) with efficiency at P40: production comes from volume, not from accuracySource: cohort profile of the competition (scout_perfil_liga)
  • !This season’s sample does not reach the comfortable minimumSource: cohort profile of the competition (scout_perfil_liga)
  • !Limited sample: 7 games · 150′ · 52 three-point attempts. The percentage is not an equivalent signal to a large sample.Source: Scout index (box scores aggregated by season) (scout_player_season)
Physical tools
Height
195.0 cm
Weight
Not verified

official roster of u20 eurobasket 2025

Athleticism · strength · mobility: not measured. The only athletic-testing source in the system is the NBA Draft Combine. No NBA record is linked to this person with evidence: the Combine is matched through that link.

Fit & translation
Open question

At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.

Shot profile

No accredited shot geometry for U20 national teams: a map that has not been measured is not drawn. The 2/3 split declared by the source is in the evidence.

My follow-up
…
▸Suggested questions
Scout notebook

🏠 Club according to the official FIBA roster of u20 eurobasket 2025: Sokol Písek Sršni · CZE · 195 cm · Shooting Guard

…
▸Not published on this profile: How this player is changing · Why this player is on the Radar · Physical profile · NBA Draft Combine · League level context · NBA Outlook· why
  • How this player is changing — Only one indexed season: there is no evolution to measure.
  • Why this player is on the Radar — No Radar signal in U20 national teams: either none is triggered, or the competition is not covered by the Radar.
  • Physical profile · NBA Draft Combine — No NBA record is linked to this person with evidence: the Combine is matched through that link.
  • League level context — At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.
  • NBA Outlook — The NBA Outlook only covers draft board prospects with an NCAA record.

Modules with no data for this player, with the reason. These are not zeros.

▸Methodology, sources and limits
▸League level context· At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.

At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.

▸What we do not show, and why
  • usg_pct — It only exists at career level; as a season figure it is not that.
  • ast_pct — It only exists at career level.
  • orb_pct — It only exists at career level.
  • drb_pct — It only exists at career level.
  • How this player is changing — Only one indexed season: there is no evolution to measure.
  • Why this player is on the Radar — No Radar signal in U20 national teams: either none is triggered, or the competition is not covered by the Radar.
  • League level context — At least one competition change is needed for a translation to exist.
  • NBA Outlook — The NBA Outlook only covers draft board prospects with an NCAA record.
  • Physical profile · NBA Draft Combine — No NBA record is linked to this person with evidence: the Combine is matched through that link.

This dossier does not score the player. Ranking prospects with this data was measured to have no signal, so no score is invented.

Identity: eje_comun · Source: official FIBA roster (fiba_roster)