SportiveWorld

Career atlas

Metta World Peace: 17 seasons, 6 teams, 1 competitions

From 1999-00 to 2016-17

Metta World Peace
Confidence: highData through: 1999-00 → 2016-17

The question

How did Metta World Peace evolve?

The evidence

When it really changed

4.8 points per gamecompared against: 12.4 points per game (-7.6 · -61 %) · Metta World Peace in 2012-13

The stints

One row per stint: league, team and years. Chronological order; when two overlap, the origin comes first.

  • CHI1999-00 → 2000-01

    NBA · 2 seasons

  • CHI → IND2001-02

    NBA · 1 season

  • IND2002-03 → 2004-05

    NBA · 3 seasons

  • IND → SAC2005-06

    NBA · 1 season

  • SAC2006-07 → 2007-08

    NBA · 2 seasons

  • HOU2008-09

    NBA · 1 season

  • LAL2009-10 → 2012-13

    NBA · 4 seasons

  • NYK2013-14

    NBA · 1 season

  • LAL2015-16 → 2016-17

    NBA · 2 seasons

When it really changed

Not every season is a change. Only jumps above the threshold declared below appear here. «Changed» means a jump larger than 4.1 points per game. It is a declared threshold, not a model.

  • 2008-09Team change: from SAC to HOU

    NBA · HOU

    Before
    2007-08 · SAC · 20.5 points per game
    After
    2008-09 · HOU · 17.1 points per game
    Context
    NBA · HOU
  • 2009-10Team change: from HOU to LAL

    NBA · LAL

    Before
    2008-09 · HOU · 17.1 points per game
    After
    2009-10 · LAL · 11.0 points per game
    The measure
    -6.1 points per game versus the previous season
    Context
    NBA · LAL
  • 2013-14Team change: from LAL to NYK

    NBA · NYK

    Before
    2012-13 · LAL · 12.4 points per game
    After
    2013-14 · NYK · 4.8 points per game
    The measure
    -7.6 points per game versus the previous season
    Context
    NBA · NYK
  • 2015-16Team change: from NYK to LAL

    NBA · LAL

    Before
    2013-14 · NYK · 4.8 points per game
    After
    2015-16 · LAL · 5.0 points per game
    Context
    NBA · LAL

Production, season by season

An ACB point and an NBA point are not the same unit. The line puts seasons side by side; it does not make them equal.

  • 1999-0012.0 points per game

    NBA · CHI · 72 games

  • 2000-0111.9 points per game

    NBA · CHI · 76 games

  • 2001-0213.2 points per game

    NBA · CHI → IND · 55 games

  • 2002-0315.5 points per game

    NBA · IND · 69 games

  • 2003-0418.3 points per game

    NBA · IND · 73 games

  • 2004-0524.6 points per game

    NBA · IND · 7 games

  • 2005-0617.6 points per game

    NBA · IND → SAC · 56 games

  • 2006-0718.8 points per game

    NBA · SAC · 70 games

  • 2007-0820.5 points per game

    NBA · SAC · 57 games

  • 2008-0917.1 points per game

    NBA · HOU · 69 games

  • 2009-1011.0 points per game

    NBA · LAL · 77 games

  • 2010-118.5 points per game

    NBA · LAL · 82 games

  • 2011-127.7 points per game

    NBA · LAL · 64 games

  • 2012-1312.4 points per game

    NBA · LAL · 75 games

  • 2013-144.8 points per game

    NBA · NYK · 29 games

  • 2015-165.0 points per game

    NBA · LAL · 35 games

  • 2016-172.3 points per game

    NBA · LAL · 25 games

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • An ACB point and an NBA point are not the same unit. The line puts seasons side by side; it does not make them equal.
  • «Changed» means a jump larger than 4.1 points per game. It is a declared threshold, not a model.
  • Role is read from minutes and production. We do not have a declared position for every European season.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-14

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonSeasons outside the NBA · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.