SportiveWorldSportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Minnesota Timberwolves attack through catch & shoot

22.9 % of their plays · 2025-26

22.9

%

Confidence: highData through: 2025-26Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.

The question

How does Minnesota Timberwolves play?

The evidence

Minnesota Timberwolves · catch & shoot: 1.118 points per play

1.118 points per playcompared against: 1.050 points per play (+0.07 · +7 %)

On offense

The play-type split describes where the points come from, not how well each one is defended.

  • catch & shoot1.12 points per play

    22.9 % of their plays · 93th percentile

  • transition1.17 points per play

    19.0 % of their plays · 76th percentile

  • pick & roll (ball-handler)0.88 points per play

    13.1 % of their plays · 62th percentile

  • one-on-one0.96 points per play

    9.6 % of their plays · 83th percentile

  • hand-offs0.98 points per play

    5.7 % of their plays · 83th percentile

  • putbacks1.16 points per play

    5.6 % of their plays · 62th percentile

  • miscellaneous plays0.49 points per play

    5.5 % of their plays · 45th percentile

  • cuts to the basket1.18 points per play

    5.2 % of their plays · 0th percentile

  • coming off screens0.95 points per play

    5.0 % of their plays · 35th percentile

  • rolling to the rim1.16 points per play

    4.2 % of their plays · 72th percentile

  • post-ups0.99 points per play

    4.1 % of their plays · 52th percentile

On defense

What the team concedes on each play type. A high percentile is good defense: fewer points allowed per play.

  • catch & shoot1.03 points per play

    20.4 % of their plays · 69th percentile

  • transition1.13 points per play

    19.0 % of their plays · 55th percentile

  • pick & roll (ball-handler)0.88 points per play

    18.1 % of their plays · 52th percentile

  • one-on-one0.86 points per play

    7.4 % of their plays · 93th percentile

  • cuts to the basket1.23 points per play

    6.3 % of their plays · 86th percentile

  • miscellaneous plays0.56 points per play

    6.3 % of their plays · 7th percentile

  • rolling to the rim1.09 points per play

    5.7 % of their plays · 59th percentile

  • hand-offs0.97 points per play

    5.2 % of their plays · 38th percentile

  • putbacks1.03 points per play

    5.1 % of their plays · 100th percentile

  • coming off screens0.90 points per play

    4.2 % of their plays · 79th percentile

  • post-ups1.12 points per play

    2.3 % of their plays · 0th percentile

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does NOT prove

  • The play-type split describes where the points come from, not how well each one is defended.
  • It portrays the 2025-26 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • There is no movement or touch data: what we do not measure does not appear, and is not replaced by something else.

From here

Contract sheet

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-09-23

Where this comes from

Play-type breakdown · closed season · its clock is the season