SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Travis Diener: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2009-10 · 9 games

97

percentil

Travis Diener
Confidence: lowData through: 2009-10

The question

What kind of player is Travis Diener?

The evidence

Travis Diener · Defensive impact: 97th percentile (DBPM 2.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

97 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+47) · 392 players with a sample in 2009-10

Travis Diener: what moved most is Scoring

9 percentilcompared against: 30 percentil (-21) · Travis Diener, from 2005-06 to 2008-09

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 5.7 minutes per game across 9 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 97th percentile

    DBPM 2.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 392 players with a sample in 2009-10. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    0.7 points per game

  • Playmaking33th percentile

    0.9 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact97th percentile

    DBPM 2.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    0.3 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact97th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 2.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Playmaking33th percentile

    Low · 0.9 assists per game

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 0.7 points per game

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    Very low · 0.3 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 26th percentile → 0th percentile (-26) · Playmaking: 31th percentile → 33th percentile (+2) · Rebounding: 3th percentile → 0th percentile (-3)

  • 2005-0626th percentile

    23 games · 10.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    26th percentile
    Playmaking
    31th percentile
    Rebounding
    3th percentile
  • 2006-0721th percentile

    26 games · 11.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    21th percentile
    Playmaking
    49th percentile
    Rebounding
    1th percentile
  • 2007-0843th percentile

    66 games · 20.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    43th percentile
    Playmaking
    85th percentile
    Rebounding
    15th percentile
  • 2008-0917th percentile

    55 games · 13.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    17th percentile
    Playmaking
    69th percentile
    Rebounding
    12th percentile
  • 2009-100th percentile

    9 games · 5.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    33th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile

Context

2009-10 · 9 games · 5.7 minutes per game · Percentile against 392 measured players in 2009-10 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2009-10 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-08

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.