SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

David Wood: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1996-97 · 46 games

90

percentil

David Wood
Confidence: lowData through: 1996-97

The question

What kind of player is David Wood?

The evidence

David Wood · Defensive impact: 90th percentile (DBPM 1.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

90 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+40) · 373 players with a sample in 1996-97

David Wood: what moved most is Rebounding

33 percentilcompared against: 29 percentil (+4) · David Wood, from 1990-91 to 1993-94

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 5.2 minutes per game across 46 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 90th percentile

    DBPM 1.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 373 players with a sample in 1996-97. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring1th percentile

    1.2 points per game

  • Playmaking5th percentile

    0.3 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact90th percentile

    DBPM 1.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding2th percentile

    0.6 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact90th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 1.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Playmaking5th percentile

    Very low · 0.3 assists per game

  • Rebounding2th percentile

    Very low · 0.6 rebounds per game

  • Scoring1th percentile

    Very low · 1.2 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 31th percentile → 1th percentile (-30) · Playmaking: 36th percentile → 5th percentile (-31) · Rebounding: 45th percentile → 2th percentile (-43)

  • 1990-9145th percentile

    82 games · 17.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    31th percentile
    Playmaking
    36th percentile
    Rebounding
    45th percentile
  • 1992-9312th percentile

    64 games · 9.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    7th percentile
    Playmaking
    13th percentile
    Rebounding
    12th percentile
  • 1993-9446th percentile

    78 games · 15.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    20th percentile
    Playmaking
    21th percentile
    Rebounding
    46th percentile
  • 1994-9548th percentile

    78 games · 17.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    33th percentile
    Playmaking
    25th percentile
    Rebounding
    48th percentile
  • 1995-9636th percentile

    62 games · 12.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    15th percentile
    Playmaking
    14th percentile
    Rebounding
    36th percentile
  • 1996-972th percentile

    46 games · 5.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    1th percentile
    Playmaking
    5th percentile
    Rebounding
    2th percentile

Context

1996-97 · 46 games · 5.2 minutes per game · Percentile against 373 measured players in 1996-97 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1996-97 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.