SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Robert Pack: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2003-04 · 26 games

92

percentil

Robert Pack
Confidence: lowData through: 2003-04

The question

What kind of player is Robert Pack?

The evidence

Robert Pack · Defensive impact: 92th percentile (DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

92 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+42) · 372 players with a sample in 2003-04

Robert Pack: what moved most is Scoring

3 percentilcompared against: 44 percentil (-41) · Robert Pack, from 1998-99 to 2003-04

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 8.5 minutes per game across 26 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 92th percentile

    DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 372 players with a sample in 2003-04. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring3th percentile

    1.9 points per game

  • Playmaking36th percentile

    1.0 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact92th percentile

    DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding1th percentile

    0.7 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact92th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Playmaking36th percentile

    Low · 1.0 assists per game

  • Scoring3th percentile

    Very low · 1.9 points per game

  • Rebounding1th percentile

    Very low · 0.7 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 57th percentile → 3th percentile (-54) · Playmaking: 81th percentile → 36th percentile (-45) · Rebounding: 9th percentile → 1th percentile (-8)

  • 1998-9957th percentile

    25 games · 18.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    57th percentile
    Playmaking
    81th percentile
    Rebounding
    9th percentile
  • 1999-0062th percentile

    29 games · 22.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    62th percentile
    Playmaking
    95th percentile
    Rebounding
    8th percentile
  • 2000-0146th percentile

    74 games · 17.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    46th percentile
    Playmaking
    87th percentile
    Rebounding
    20th percentile
  • 2001-0221th percentile

    16 games · 15.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    21th percentile
    Playmaking
    79th percentile
    Rebounding
    11th percentile
  • 2002-0333th percentile

    28 games · 15.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    33th percentile
    Playmaking
    75th percentile
    Rebounding
    14th percentile
  • 2003-043th percentile

    26 games · 8.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    3th percentile
    Playmaking
    36th percentile
    Rebounding
    1th percentile

Context

2003-04 · 26 games · 8.5 minutes per game · Percentile against 372 measured players in 2003-04 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2003-04 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.