Professional DNA

Cedric Henderson: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2001-02 · 12 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2001-02

The question

What kind of player is Cedric Henderson?

The evidence

Cedric Henderson · Defensive impact: 94th percentile (DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

94 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+44) · 380 players with a sample in 2001-02

Cedric Henderson: what moved most is Rebounding

15 percentilcompared against: 62 percentil (-47) · Cedric Henderson, from 1997-98 to 1999-00

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 5.8 minutes per game across 12 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 94th percentile
DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 380 players with a sample in 2001-02. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring12th percentile
3.0 points per game
Playmaking6th percentile
0.3 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact94th percentile
DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding0th percentile
0.3 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact94th percentile
Elite · DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

Scoring12th percentile
Very low · 3.0 points per game
Playmaking6th percentile
Very low · 0.3 assists per game
Rebounding0th percentile
Very low · 0.3 rebounds per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 64th percentile → 12th percentile (-52) · Playmaking: 60th percentile → 6th percentile (-54) · Rebounding: 63th percentile → 0th percentile (-63)

1997-9863th percentile
82 games · 30.8 minutes per game
Scoring
64th percentile
Playmaking
60th percentile
Rebounding
63th percentile
1998-9961th percentile
50 games · 30.3 minutes per game
Scoring
59th percentile
Playmaking
69th percentile
Rebounding
61th percentile
1999-0030th percentile
61 games · 18.1 minutes per game
Scoring
32th percentile
Playmaking
29th percentile
Rebounding
30th percentile
2000-0114th percentile
55 games · 17.5 minutes per game
Scoring
23th percentile
Playmaking
50th percentile
Rebounding
14th percentile
2001-020th percentile
12 games · 5.8 minutes per game
Scoring
12th percentile
Playmaking
6th percentile
Rebounding
0th percentile

Context

2001-02 · 12 games · 5.8 minutes per game · Percentile against 380 measured players in 2001-02 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2001-02 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.