SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Steve Henson: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1998-99 · 4 games

29

percentil

Steve Henson
Confidence: lowData through: 1998-99

The question

What kind of player is Steve Henson?

The evidence

Steve Henson · Defensive impact: 29th percentile (DBPM -0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

29 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-21) · 337 players with a sample in 1998-99

Steve Henson: what moved most is Playmaking

15 percentilcompared against: 59 percentil (-44) · Steve Henson, from 1991-92 to 1997-98

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 6.3 minutes per game across 4 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 29th percentile

    DBPM -0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 337 players with a sample in 1998-99. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    1.0 points per game

  • Playmaking28th percentile

    0.8 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact29th percentile

    DBPM -0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    0.0 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact29th percentile

    Low · DBPM -0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Playmaking28th percentile

    Low · 0.8 assists per game

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 1.0 points per game

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    Very low · 0.0 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 12th percentile → 0th percentile (-12) · Playmaking: 47th percentile → 28th percentile (-19) · Rebounding: 2th percentile → 0th percentile (-2)

  • 1991-9247th percentile

    50 games · 7.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    12th percentile
    Playmaking
    47th percentile
    Rebounding
    2th percentile
  • 1992-9373th percentile

    53 games · 13.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    19th percentile
    Playmaking
    73th percentile
    Rebounding
    5th percentile
  • 1993-9451th percentile

    3 games · 5.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    51th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile
  • 1994-9565th percentile

    37 games · 10.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    12th percentile
    Playmaking
    65th percentile
    Rebounding
    1th percentile
  • 1997-981th percentile

    23 games · 2.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    2th percentile
    Playmaking
    1th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile
  • 1998-9928th percentile

    4 games · 6.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    28th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile

Context

1998-99 · 4 games · 6.3 minutes per game · Percentile against 337 measured players in 1998-99 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1998-99 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.