Professional DNA

Michael Olowokandi: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2006-07 · 24 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2006-07

The question

What kind of player is Michael Olowokandi?

The evidence

Michael Olowokandi · Defensive impact: 96th percentile (DBPM 2.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

96 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+46) · 395 players with a sample in 2006-07

Michael Olowokandi: what moved most is Rebounding

24 percentilcompared against: 83 percentil (-59) · Michael Olowokandi, from 2001-02 to 2006-07

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 9.8 minutes per game across 24 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 96th percentile
DBPM 2.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 395 players with a sample in 2006-07. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring3th percentile
1.7 points per game
Playmaking2th percentile
0.2 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact96th percentile
DBPM 2.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding24th percentile
2.0 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact96th percentile
Elite · DBPM 2.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

Rebounding24th percentile
Very low · 2.0 rebounds per game
Scoring3th percentile
Very low · 1.7 points per game
Playmaking2th percentile
Very low · 0.2 assists per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 70th percentile → 3th percentile (-67) · Playmaking: 37th percentile → 2th percentile (-35) · Rebounding: 95th percentile → 24th percentile (-71)

2001-0295th percentile
80 games · 32.1 minutes per game
Scoring
70th percentile
Playmaking
37th percentile
Rebounding
95th percentile
2002-0397th percentile
36 games · 38.0 minutes per game
Scoring
76th percentile
Playmaking
43th percentile
Rebounding
97th percentile
2003-0480th percentile
43 games · 21.5 minutes per game
Scoring
46th percentile
Playmaking
19th percentile
Rebounding
80th percentile
2004-0573th percentile
62 games · 19.6 minutes per game
Scoring
37th percentile
Playmaking
14th percentile
Rebounding
73th percentile
2005-0670th percentile
48 games · 19.1 minutes per game
Scoring
35th percentile
Playmaking
21th percentile
Rebounding
70th percentile
2006-0724th percentile
24 games · 9.8 minutes per game
Scoring
3th percentile
Playmaking
2th percentile
Rebounding
24th percentile

Context

2006-07 · 24 games · 9.8 minutes per game · Percentile against 395 measured players in 2006-07 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2006-07 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.