Professional DNA

Matt Harpring: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2008-09 · 63 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2008-09

The question

What kind of player is Matt Harpring?

The evidence

Matt Harpring · Defensive impact: 52th percentile (DBPM 0.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

52 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+2) · 384 players with a sample in 2008-09

Matt Harpring: what moved most is Rebounding

23 percentilcompared against: 74 percentil (-51) · Matt Harpring, from 2003-04 to 2008-09

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 11.0 minutes per game across 63 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 52th percentile
DBPM 0.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 384 players with a sample in 2008-09. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring27th percentile
4.4 points per game
Playmaking10th percentile
0.4 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact52th percentile
DBPM 0.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rim34th percentile
56.3 % · 96 attempts
Rebounding23th percentile
2.0 rebounds per game

Limitations

Finishing at the rim34th percentile
Low · 56.3 % · 96 attempts
Scoring27th percentile
Low · 4.4 points per game
Rebounding23th percentile
Very low · 2.0 rebounds per game
Playmaking10th percentile
Very low · 0.4 assists per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 86th percentile → 27th percentile (-59) · Playmaking: 61th percentile → 10th percentile (-51) · Rebounding: 92th percentile → 23th percentile (-69)

2003-0492th percentile
31 games · 36.6 minutes per game
Scoring
86th percentile
Playmaking
61th percentile
Rebounding
92th percentile
2004-0583th percentile
78 games · 33.1 minutes per game
Scoring
80th percentile
Playmaking
58th percentile
Rebounding
83th percentile
2005-0678th percentile
71 games · 27.4 minutes per game
Scoring
77th percentile
Playmaking
54th percentile
Rebounding
78th percentile
2006-0770th percentile
77 games · 25.5 minutes per game
Scoring
71th percentile
Playmaking
49th percentile
Rebounding
70th percentile
2007-0848th percentile
76 games · 18.1 minutes per game
Scoring
53th percentile
Playmaking
38th percentile
Rebounding
48th percentile
2008-0923th percentile
63 games · 11.0 minutes per game
Scoring
27th percentile
Playmaking
10th percentile
Rebounding
23th percentile

Context

2008-09 · 63 games · 11.0 minutes per game · Percentile against 384 measured players in 2008-09 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2008-09 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-13

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.