SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Jeff Foster: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2011-12 · 11 games

88

percentil

Jeff Foster
Confidence: lowData through: 2011-12

The question

What kind of player is Jeff Foster?

The evidence

Jeff Foster · Defensive impact: 88th percentile (DBPM 1.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

88 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+38) · 399 players with a sample in 2011-12

Jeff Foster: what moved most is Rebounding

61 percentilcompared against: 86 percentil (-25) · Jeff Foster, from 2006-07 to 2011-12

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 12.8 minutes per game across 11 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 88th percentile

    DBPM 1.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 399 players with a sample in 2011-12. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring7th percentile

    2.3 points per game

  • Playmaking11th percentile

    0.4 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact88th percentile

    DBPM 1.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding61th percentile

    3.8 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact88th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 1.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Playmaking11th percentile

    Very low · 0.4 assists per game

  • Scoring7th percentile

    Very low · 2.3 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 25th percentile → 7th percentile (-18) · Playmaking: 29th percentile → 11th percentile (-18) · Rebounding: 93th percentile → 61th percentile (-32)

  • 2006-0793th percentile

    75 games · 23.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    25th percentile
    Playmaking
    29th percentile
    Rebounding
    93th percentile
  • 2007-0893th percentile

    77 games · 24.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    39th percentile
    Playmaking
    57th percentile
    Rebounding
    93th percentile
  • 2008-0986th percentile

    74 games · 24.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    40th percentile
    Playmaking
    58th percentile
    Rebounding
    86th percentile
  • 2009-1074th percentile

    16 games · 15.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    12th percentile
    Playmaking
    44th percentile
    Rebounding
    74th percentile
  • 2010-1185th percentile

    56 games · 16.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    13th percentile
    Playmaking
    30th percentile
    Rebounding
    85th percentile
  • 2011-1261th percentile

    11 games · 12.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    7th percentile
    Playmaking
    11th percentile
    Rebounding
    61th percentile

Context

2011-12 · 11 games · 12.8 minutes per game · Percentile against 399 measured players in 2011-12 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2011-12 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.