SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Evan Eschmeyer: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2002-03 · 17 games

100

percentil

Evan Eschmeyer
Confidence: lowData through: 2002-03

The question

What kind of player is Evan Eschmeyer?

The evidence

Evan Eschmeyer · Defensive impact: 100th percentile (DBPM 3.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

100 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+50) · 363 players with a sample in 2002-03

Evan Eschmeyer: what moved most is Rebounding

13 percentilcompared against: 55 percentil (-42) · Evan Eschmeyer, from 1999-00 to 2002-03

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 7.9 minutes per game across 17 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 100th percentile

    DBPM 3.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 363 players with a sample in 2002-03. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    1.0 points per game

  • Playmaking10th percentile

    0.4 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact100th percentile

    DBPM 3.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding13th percentile

    1.7 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact100th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 3.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Rebounding13th percentile

    Very low · 1.7 rebounds per game

  • Playmaking10th percentile

    Very low · 0.4 assists per game

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 1.0 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 14th percentile → 0th percentile (-14) · Playmaking: 22th percentile → 10th percentile (-12) · Rebounding: 51th percentile → 13th percentile (-38)

  • 1999-0051th percentile

    31 games · 12.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    14th percentile
    Playmaking
    22th percentile
    Rebounding
    51th percentile
  • 2000-0172th percentile

    74 games · 18.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    16th percentile
    Playmaking
    14th percentile
    Rebounding
    72th percentile
  • 2001-0243th percentile

    31 games · 9.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    5th percentile
    Playmaking
    6th percentile
    Rebounding
    43th percentile
  • 2002-0313th percentile

    17 games · 7.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    10th percentile
    Rebounding
    13th percentile

Context

2002-03 · 17 games · 7.9 minutes per game · Percentile against 363 measured players in 2002-03 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2002-03 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.