SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Francisco Elson: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2011-12 · 5 games

99

percentil

Francisco Elson
Confidence: lowData through: 2011-12

The question

What kind of player is Francisco Elson?

The evidence

Francisco Elson · Defensive impact: 99th percentile (DBPM 2.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

99 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+49) · 399 players with a sample in 2011-12

Francisco Elson: what moved most is Rebounding

9 percentilcompared against: 60 percentil (-51) · Francisco Elson, from 2006-07 to 2009-10

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 3.2 minutes per game across 5 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 99th percentile

    DBPM 2.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 399 players with a sample in 2011-12. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    0.4 points per game

  • Playmaking2th percentile

    0.2 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact99th percentile

    DBPM 2.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    0.2 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact99th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 2.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Playmaking2th percentile

    Very low · 0.2 assists per game

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 0.4 points per game

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    Very low · 0.2 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 32th percentile → 0th percentile (-32) · Playmaking: 29th percentile → 2th percentile (-27) · Rebounding: 73th percentile → 0th percentile (-73)

  • 2006-0773th percentile

    70 games · 19.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    32th percentile
    Playmaking
    29th percentile
    Rebounding
    73th percentile
  • 2007-0848th percentile

    63 games · 12.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    14th percentile
    Playmaking
    11th percentile
    Rebounding
    48th percentile
  • 2008-0959th percentile

    59 games · 16.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    14th percentile
    Playmaking
    17th percentile
    Rebounding
    59th percentile
  • 2009-107th percentile

    12 games · 5.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    1th percentile
    Playmaking
    3th percentile
    Rebounding
    7th percentile
  • 2010-1119th percentile

    62 games · 9.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    6th percentile
    Playmaking
    16th percentile
    Rebounding
    19th percentile
  • 2011-120th percentile

    5 games · 3.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    2th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile

Context

2011-12 · 5 games · 3.2 minutes per game · Percentile against 399 measured players in 2011-12 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2011-12 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.