Professional DNA

Lou Amundson: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2015-16 · 29 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2015-16

The question

What kind of player is Lou Amundson?

The evidence

Lou Amundson · Defensive impact: 43th percentile (DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

43 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-7) · 414 players with a sample in 2015-16

Lou Amundson: what moved most is Rebounding

13 percentilcompared against: 56 percentil (-43) · Lou Amundson, from 2010-11 to 2015-16

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 7.0 minutes per game across 29 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 43th percentile
DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 414 players with a sample in 2015-16. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring2th percentile
1.8 points per game
Playmaking5th percentile
0.4 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact43th percentile
DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding13th percentile
1.7 rebounds per game

Limitations

Defensive impact43th percentile
Average · DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Rebounding13th percentile
Very low · 1.7 rebounds per game
Playmaking5th percentile
Very low · 0.4 assists per game
Scoring2th percentile
Very low · 1.8 points per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.
See Tracking →

Recent change

Scoring: 22th percentile → 2th percentile (-20) · Playmaking: 10th percentile → 5th percentile (-5) · Rebounding: 64th percentile → 13th percentile (-51)

2010-1164th percentile
46 games · 15.0 minutes per game
Scoring
22th percentile
Playmaking
10th percentile
Rebounding
64th percentile
2011-1258th percentile
60 games · 12.6 minutes per game
Scoring
18th percentile
Playmaking
2th percentile
Rebounding
58th percentile
2012-1339th percentile
39 games · 9.5 minutes per game
Scoring
3th percentile
Playmaking
3th percentile
Rebounding
39th percentile
2013-1444th percentile
19 games · 9.7 minutes per game
Scoring
5th percentile
Playmaking
4th percentile
Rebounding
44th percentile
2014-1574th percentile
53 games · 17.7 minutes per game
Scoring
25th percentile
Playmaking
47th percentile
Rebounding
74th percentile
2015-1613th percentile
29 games · 7.0 minutes per game
Scoring
2th percentile
Playmaking
5th percentile
Rebounding
13th percentile

Context

2015-16 · 29 games · 7.0 minutes per game · Percentile against 414 measured players in 2015-16 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2015-16 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-13

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.