SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Kyrylo Fesenko: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2011-12 · 3 games

100

percentil

Kyrylo Fesenko
Confidence: lowData through: 2011-12

The question

What kind of player is Kyrylo Fesenko?

The evidence

Kyrylo Fesenko · Defensive impact: 100th percentile (DBPM 3.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

100 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+50) · 399 players with a sample in 2011-12

Kyrylo Fesenko: what moved most is Scoring

9 percentilcompared against: 5 percentil (+4) · Kyrylo Fesenko, from 2007-08 to 2011-12

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 5.7 minutes per game across 3 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 100th percentile

    DBPM 3.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 399 players with a sample in 2011-12. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring9th percentile

    2.7 points per game

  • Playmaking6th percentile

    0.3 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact100th percentile

    DBPM 3.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding42th percentile

    3.0 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact100th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 3.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Rebounding42th percentile

    Average · 3.0 rebounds per game

  • Scoring9th percentile

    Very low · 2.7 points per game

  • Playmaking6th percentile

    Very low · 0.3 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 3th percentile → 9th percentile (+6) · Playmaking: 2th percentile → 6th percentile (+4) · Rebounding: 39th percentile → 42th percentile (+3)

  • 2007-083th percentile

    9 games · 7.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    3th percentile
    Playmaking
    2th percentile
    Rebounding
    39th percentile
  • 2008-094th percentile

    21 games · 7.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    4th percentile
    Playmaking
    2th percentile
    Rebounding
    17th percentile
  • 2009-108th percentile

    49 games · 8.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    8th percentile
    Playmaking
    7th percentile
    Rebounding
    17th percentile
  • 2010-114th percentile

    53 games · 8.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    4th percentile
    Playmaking
    5th percentile
    Rebounding
    21th percentile
  • 2011-129th percentile

    3 games · 5.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    9th percentile
    Playmaking
    6th percentile
    Rebounding
    42th percentile

Context

2011-12 · 3 games · 5.7 minutes per game · Percentile against 399 measured players in 2011-12 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2011-12 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.