Professional DNA

Roy Hibbert: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2016-17 · 48 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2016-17

The question

What kind of player is Roy Hibbert?

The evidence

Roy Hibbert · Defensive impact: 80th percentile (DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

80 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+30) · 413 players with a sample in 2016-17

Roy Hibbert: what moved most is Scoring

26 percentilcompared against: 72 percentil (-46) · Roy Hibbert, from 2011-12 to 2015-16

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 14.2 minutes per game across 48 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 80th percentile
DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 413 players with a sample in 2016-17. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring20th percentile
4.6 points per game
Playmaking6th percentile
0.4 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact80th percentile
DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rim76th percentile
66.0 % · 50 attempts
Rebounding47th percentile
3.2 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact80th percentile
Very high · DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rim76th percentile
Very high · 66.0 % · 50 attempts

Limitations

Rebounding47th percentile
Average · 3.2 rebounds per game
Scoring20th percentile
Very low · 4.6 points per game
Playmaking6th percentile
Very low · 0.4 assists per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.
See Tracking →

Recent change

Scoring: 79th percentile → 20th percentile (-59) · Playmaking: 57th percentile → 6th percentile (-51) · Rebounding: 95th percentile → 47th percentile (-48)

2011-1279th percentile
65 games · 29.8 minutes per game
Scoring
79th percentile
Playmaking
57th percentile
Rebounding
95th percentile
2012-1374th percentile
79 games · 28.7 minutes per game
Scoring
74th percentile
Playmaking
50th percentile
Rebounding
94th percentile
2013-1468th percentile
81 games · 29.7 minutes per game
Scoring
68th percentile
Playmaking
42th percentile
Rebounding
87th percentile
2014-1568th percentile
76 games · 25.3 minutes per game
Scoring
68th percentile
Playmaking
38th percentile
Rebounding
90th percentile
2015-1632th percentile
81 games · 23.2 minutes per game
Scoring
32th percentile
Playmaking
41th percentile
Rebounding
73th percentile
2016-1720th percentile
48 games · 14.2 minutes per game
Scoring
20th percentile
Playmaking
6th percentile
Rebounding
47th percentile

Context

2016-17 · 48 games · 14.2 minutes per game · Percentile against 413 measured players in 2016-17 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2016-17 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-13

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.