SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Tyler Hansbrough: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2015-16 · 44 games

40

percentil

Tyler Hansbrough
Confidence: lowData through: 2015-16

The question

What kind of player is Tyler Hansbrough?

The evidence

Tyler Hansbrough · Defensive impact: 40th percentile (DBPM -0.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

40 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-10) · 414 players with a sample in 2015-16

Tyler Hansbrough: what moved most is Scoring

9 percentilcompared against: 51 percentil (-42) · Tyler Hansbrough, from 2010-11 to 2014-15

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 7.8 minutes per game across 44 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 40th percentile

    DBPM -0.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 414 players with a sample in 2015-16. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring4th percentile

    2.4 points per game

  • Playmaking1th percentile

    0.2 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact40th percentile

    DBPM -0.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding20th percentile

    2.0 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact40th percentile

    Average · DBPM -0.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Rebounding20th percentile

    Very low · 2.0 rebounds per game

  • Scoring4th percentile

    Very low · 2.4 points per game

  • Playmaking1th percentile

    Very low · 0.2 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

Recent change

Scoring: 68th percentile → 4th percentile (-64) · Playmaking: 21th percentile → 1th percentile (-20) · Rebounding: 77th percentile → 20th percentile (-57)

  • 2010-1168th percentile

    70 games · 21.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    68th percentile
    Playmaking
    21th percentile
    Rebounding
    77th percentile
  • 2011-1259th percentile

    66 games · 21.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    59th percentile
    Playmaking
    17th percentile
    Rebounding
    69th percentile
  • 2012-1345th percentile

    81 games · 16.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    45th percentile
    Playmaking
    8th percentile
    Rebounding
    71th percentile
  • 2013-1430th percentile

    64 games · 15.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    30th percentile
    Playmaking
    4th percentile
    Rebounding
    69th percentile
  • 2014-1513th percentile

    74 games · 14.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    13th percentile
    Playmaking
    4th percentile
    Rebounding
    54th percentile
  • 2015-164th percentile

    44 games · 7.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    4th percentile
    Playmaking
    1th percentile
    Rebounding
    20th percentile

Context

2015-16 · 44 games · 7.8 minutes per game · Percentile against 414 measured players in 2015-16 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2015-16 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-13

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.