Professional DNA

Greivis Vásquez: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2016-17 · 3 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2016-17

The question

What kind of player is Greivis Vásquez?

The evidence

Greivis Vásquez · Defensive impact: 79th percentile (DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

79 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+29) · 414 players with a sample in 2016-17

Greivis Vásquez: what moved most is Scoring

17 percentilcompared against: 65 percentil (-48) · Greivis Vásquez, from 2011-12 to 2015-16

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 13.0 minutes per game across 3 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 79th percentile
DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 414 players with a sample in 2016-17. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring3th percentile
2.3 points per game
Playmaking57th percentile
1.7 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact79th percentile
DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding1th percentile
0.7 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact79th percentile
Very high · DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

Scoring3th percentile
Very low · 2.3 points per game
Rebounding1th percentile
Very low · 0.7 rebounds per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.
See Tracking →

Recent change

Scoring: 56th percentile → 3th percentile (-53) · Playmaking: 93th percentile → 57th percentile (-36) · Rebounding: 35th percentile → 1th percentile (-34)

2011-1256th percentile
66 games · 25.8 minutes per game
Scoring
56th percentile
Playmaking
93th percentile
Rebounding
35th percentile
2012-1381th percentile
78 games · 34.4 minutes per game
Scoring
81th percentile
Playmaking
100th percentile
Rebounding
68th percentile
2013-1461th percentile
79 games · 22.5 minutes per game
Scoring
61th percentile
Playmaking
87th percentile
Rebounding
27th percentile
2014-1561th percentile
82 games · 24.3 minutes per game
Scoring
61th percentile
Playmaking
86th percentile
Rebounding
35th percentile
2015-1631th percentile
23 games · 20.0 minutes per game
Scoring
31th percentile
Playmaking
87th percentile
Rebounding
20th percentile
2016-173th percentile
3 games · 13.0 minutes per game
Scoring
3th percentile
Playmaking
57th percentile
Rebounding
1th percentile

Context

2016-17 · 3 games · 13.0 minutes per game · Percentile against 414 measured players in 2016-17 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2016-17 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-13

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.