SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Nate McMillan: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1997-98 · 18 games

92

percentil

Nate McMillan
Confidence: lowData through: 1997-98

The question

What kind of player is Nate McMillan?

The evidence

Nate McMillan · Defensive impact: 92th percentile (DBPM 1.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

92 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+42) · 370 players with a sample in 1997-98

Nate McMillan: what moved most is Rebounding

29 percentilcompared against: 59 percentil (-30) · Nate McMillan, from 1992-93 to 1997-98

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 15.5 minutes per game across 18 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 92th percentile

    DBPM 1.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 370 players with a sample in 1997-98. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring17th percentile

    3.4 points per game

  • Playmaking80th percentile

    3.1 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact92th percentile

    DBPM 1.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding29th percentile

    2.2 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact92th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 1.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Playmaking80th percentile

    Very high · 3.1 assists per game

Limitations

  • Rebounding29th percentile

    Low · 2.2 rebounds per game

  • Scoring17th percentile

    Very low · 3.4 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 43th percentile → 17th percentile (-26) · Playmaking: 91th percentile → 80th percentile (-11) · Rebounding: 65th percentile → 29th percentile (-36)

  • 1992-9365th percentile

    73 games · 27.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    43th percentile
    Playmaking
    91th percentile
    Rebounding
    65th percentile
  • 1993-9459th percentile

    73 games · 25.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    36th percentile
    Playmaking
    93th percentile
    Rebounding
    59th percentile
  • 1994-9561th percentile

    80 games · 25.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    32th percentile
    Playmaking
    93th percentile
    Rebounding
    61th percentile
  • 1995-9659th percentile

    55 games · 22.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    30th percentile
    Playmaking
    82th percentile
    Rebounding
    59th percentile
  • 1996-9751th percentile

    37 games · 21.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    29th percentile
    Playmaking
    85th percentile
    Rebounding
    51th percentile
  • 1997-9829th percentile

    18 games · 15.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    17th percentile
    Playmaking
    80th percentile
    Rebounding
    29th percentile

Context

1997-98 · 18 games · 15.5 minutes per game · Percentile against 370 measured players in 1997-98 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1997-98 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.