SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Etan Thomas: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2010-11 · 13 games

62

percentil

Etan Thomas
Confidence: lowData through: 2010-11

The question

What kind of player is Etan Thomas?

The evidence

Etan Thomas · Defensive impact: 62th percentile (DBPM 0.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

62 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+12) · 400 players with a sample in 2010-11

Etan Thomas: what moved most is Rebounding

30 percentilcompared against: 71 percentil (-41) · Etan Thomas, from 2004-05 to 2008-09

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 6.3 minutes per game across 13 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 62th percentile

    DBPM 0.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 400 players with a sample in 2010-11. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring8th percentile

    2.5 points per game

  • Playmaking3th percentile

    0.2 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact62th percentile

    DBPM 0.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding17th percentile

    1.8 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Rebounding17th percentile

    Very low · 1.8 rebounds per game

  • Scoring8th percentile

    Very low · 2.5 points per game

  • Playmaking3th percentile

    Very low · 0.2 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 48th percentile → 8th percentile (-40) · Playmaking: 10th percentile → 3th percentile (-7) · Rebounding: 73th percentile → 17th percentile (-56)

  • 2004-0573th percentile

    47 games · 20.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    48th percentile
    Playmaking
    10th percentile
    Rebounding
    73th percentile
  • 2005-0660th percentile

    71 games · 15.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    32th percentile
    Playmaking
    3th percentile
    Rebounding
    60th percentile
  • 2006-0781th percentile

    65 games · 19.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    39th percentile
    Playmaking
    12th percentile
    Rebounding
    81th percentile
  • 2008-0934th percentile

    26 games · 11.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    12th percentile
    Playmaking
    2th percentile
    Rebounding
    34th percentile
  • 2009-1039th percentile

    23 games · 14.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    13th percentile
    Playmaking
    0th percentile
    Rebounding
    39th percentile
  • 2010-1117th percentile

    13 games · 6.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    8th percentile
    Playmaking
    3th percentile
    Rebounding
    17th percentile

Context

2010-11 · 13 games · 6.3 minutes per game · Percentile against 400 measured players in 2010-11 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2010-11 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.