SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Eduardo Nájera: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2011-12 · 22 games

91

percentil

Eduardo Nájera
Confidence: lowData through: 2011-12

The question

What kind of player is Eduardo Nájera?

The evidence

Eduardo Nájera · Defensive impact: 91th percentile (DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

91 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+41) · 398 players with a sample in 2011-12

Eduardo Nájera: what moved most is Scoring

10 percentilcompared against: 40 percentil (-30) · Eduardo Nájera, from 2006-07 to 2008-09

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 12.3 minutes per game across 22 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 91th percentile

    DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 398 players with a sample in 2011-12. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring8th percentile

    2.6 points per game

  • Playmaking17th percentile

    0.5 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact91th percentile

    DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding28th percentile

    2.3 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact91th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Rebounding28th percentile

    Low · 2.3 rebounds per game

  • Playmaking17th percentile

    Very low · 0.5 assists per game

  • Scoring8th percentile

    Very low · 2.6 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 44th percentile → 8th percentile (-36) · Playmaking: 33th percentile → 17th percentile (-16) · Rebounding: 63th percentile → 28th percentile (-35)

  • 2006-0744th percentile

    75 games · 22.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    44th percentile
    Playmaking
    33th percentile
    Rebounding
    63th percentile
  • 2007-0836th percentile

    78 games · 21.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    36th percentile
    Playmaking
    41th percentile
    Rebounding
    65th percentile
  • 2008-099th percentile

    27 games · 11.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    9th percentile
    Playmaking
    26th percentile
    Rebounding
    34th percentile
  • 2009-1015th percentile

    46 games · 14.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    15th percentile
    Playmaking
    19th percentile
    Rebounding
    32th percentile
  • 2010-116th percentile

    31 games · 12.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    6th percentile
    Playmaking
    21th percentile
    Rebounding
    10th percentile
  • 2011-128th percentile

    22 games · 12.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    8th percentile
    Playmaking
    17th percentile
    Rebounding
    28th percentile

Context

2011-12 · 22 games · 12.3 minutes per game · Percentile against 398 measured players in 2011-12 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2011-12 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-13

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.