SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Jason Hart: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2009-10 · 5 games

100

percentil

Jason Hart
Confidence: lowData through: 2009-10

The question

What kind of player is Jason Hart?

The evidence

Jason Hart · Defensive impact: 100th percentile (DBPM 5.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

100 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+50) · 392 players with a sample in 2009-10

Jason Hart: what moved most is Scoring

16 percentilcompared against: 61 percentil (-45) · Jason Hart, from 2004-05 to 2005-06

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 4.4 minutes per game across 5 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 100th percentile

    DBPM 5.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 392 players with a sample in 2009-10. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    0.4 points per game

  • Playmaking42th percentile

    1.2 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact100th percentile

    DBPM 5.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    0.4 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact100th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 5.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Playmaking42th percentile

    Average · 1.2 assists per game

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 0.4 points per game

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    Very low · 0.4 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 61th percentile → 0th percentile (-61) · Playmaking: 91th percentile → 42th percentile (-49) · Rebounding: 36th percentile → 0th percentile (-36)

  • 2004-0561th percentile

    74 games · 25.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    61th percentile
    Playmaking
    91th percentile
    Rebounding
    36th percentile
  • 2005-0620th percentile

    66 games · 12.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    20th percentile
    Playmaking
    45th percentile
    Rebounding
    6th percentile
  • 2006-0746th percentile

    36 games · 23.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    46th percentile
    Playmaking
    77th percentile
    Rebounding
    39th percentile
  • 2007-0812th percentile

    57 games · 10.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    12th percentile
    Playmaking
    52th percentile
    Rebounding
    4th percentile
  • 2008-092th percentile

    39 games · 8.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    2th percentile
    Playmaking
    43th percentile
    Rebounding
    8th percentile
  • 2009-100th percentile

    5 games · 4.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    42th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile

Context

2009-10 · 5 games · 4.4 minutes per game · Percentile against 392 measured players in 2009-10 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2009-10 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.