SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Eddie Gill: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2008-09 · 6 games

99

percentil

Eddie Gill
Confidence: lowData through: 2008-09

The question

What kind of player is Eddie Gill?

The evidence

Eddie Gill · Defensive impact: 99th percentile (DBPM 3.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

99 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+49) · 385 players with a sample in 2008-09

Eddie Gill: what moved most is Scoring

7 percentilcompared against: 33 percentil (-26) · Eddie Gill, from 2001-02 to 2003-04

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 7.2 minutes per game across 6 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 99th percentile

    DBPM 3.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 385 players with a sample in 2008-09. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring4th percentile

    2.3 points per game

  • Playmaking58th percentile

    1.8 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact99th percentile

    DBPM 3.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding1th percentile

    0.7 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact99th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 3.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Scoring4th percentile

    Very low · 2.3 points per game

  • Rebounding1th percentile

    Very low · 0.7 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 33th percentile → 4th percentile (-29) · Playmaking: 65th percentile → 58th percentile (-7) · Rebounding: 7th percentile → 1th percentile (-6)

  • 2001-0233th percentile

    23 games · 16.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    33th percentile
    Playmaking
    65th percentile
    Rebounding
    7th percentile
  • 2003-046th percentile

    22 games · 7.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    6th percentile
    Playmaking
    23th percentile
    Rebounding
    2th percentile
  • 2004-0516th percentile

    73 games · 14.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    16th percentile
    Playmaking
    39th percentile
    Rebounding
    10th percentile
  • 2005-060th percentile

    41 games · 3.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    8th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile
  • 2007-0811th percentile

    14 games · 11.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    11th percentile
    Playmaking
    55th percentile
    Rebounding
    12th percentile
  • 2008-094th percentile

    6 games · 7.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    4th percentile
    Playmaking
    58th percentile
    Rebounding
    1th percentile

Context

2008-09 · 6 games · 7.2 minutes per game · Percentile against 385 measured players in 2008-09 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2008-09 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.