SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Clarence Weatherspoon: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2004-05 · 40 games

68

percentil

Clarence Weatherspoon
Confidence: lowData through: 2004-05

The question

What kind of player is Clarence Weatherspoon?

The evidence

Clarence Weatherspoon · Defensive impact: 68th percentile (DBPM 0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

68 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+18) · 388 players with a sample in 2004-05

Clarence Weatherspoon: what moved most is Scoring

44 percentilcompared against: 48 percentil (-4) · Clarence Weatherspoon, from 1999-00 to 2000-01

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 13.1 minutes per game across 40 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 68th percentile

    DBPM 0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 388 players with a sample in 2004-05. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring11th percentile

    3.1 points per game

  • Playmaking10th percentile

    0.4 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact68th percentile

    DBPM 0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding46th percentile

    3.1 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Rebounding46th percentile

    Average · 3.1 rebounds per game

  • Scoring11th percentile

    Very low · 3.1 points per game

  • Playmaking10th percentile

    Very low · 0.4 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 48th percentile → 11th percentile (-37) · Playmaking: 42th percentile → 10th percentile (-32) · Rebounding: 78th percentile → 46th percentile (-32)

  • 1999-0048th percentile

    78 games · 20.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    48th percentile
    Playmaking
    42th percentile
    Rebounding
    78th percentile
  • 2000-0173th percentile

    82 games · 33.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    73th percentile
    Playmaking
    47th percentile
    Rebounding
    97th percentile
  • 2001-0259th percentile

    56 games · 30.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    59th percentile
    Playmaking
    37th percentile
    Rebounding
    92th percentile
  • 2002-0344th percentile

    79 games · 25.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    44th percentile
    Playmaking
    29th percentile
    Rebounding
    92th percentile
  • 2003-0432th percentile

    52 games · 16.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    32th percentile
    Playmaking
    19th percentile
    Rebounding
    58th percentile
  • 2004-0511th percentile

    40 games · 13.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    11th percentile
    Playmaking
    10th percentile
    Rebounding
    46th percentile

Context

2004-05 · 40 games · 13.1 minutes per game · Percentile against 388 measured players in 2004-05 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2004-05 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.