SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Yao Ming: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2010-11 · 5 games

83

percentil

Yao Ming
Confidence: lowData through: 2010-11

The question

What kind of player is Yao Ming?

The evidence

Yao Ming · Defensive impact: 83th percentile (DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

83 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+33) · 400 players with a sample in 2010-11

Yao Ming: what moved most is Scoring

64 percentilcompared against: 95 percentil (-31) · Yao Ming, from 2004-05 to 2010-11

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 18.2 minutes per game across 5 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 83th percentile

    DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 400 players with a sample in 2010-11. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring64th percentile

    10.2 points per game

  • Playmaking30th percentile

    0.8 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact83th percentile

    DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding79th percentile

    5.4 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact83th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Rebounding79th percentile

    Very high · 5.4 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Playmaking30th percentile

    Low · 0.8 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 90th percentile → 64th percentile (-26) · Playmaking: 26th percentile → 30th percentile (+4) · Rebounding: 92th percentile → 79th percentile (-13)

  • 2004-0590th percentile

    80 games · 30.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    90th percentile
    Playmaking
    26th percentile
    Rebounding
    92th percentile
  • 2005-0696th percentile

    57 games · 34.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    96th percentile
    Playmaking
    57th percentile
    Rebounding
    99th percentile
  • 2006-0797th percentile

    48 games · 33.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    97th percentile
    Playmaking
    65th percentile
    Rebounding
    96th percentile
  • 2007-0897th percentile

    55 games · 37.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    97th percentile
    Playmaking
    70th percentile
    Rebounding
    98th percentile
  • 2008-0993th percentile

    77 games · 33.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    93th percentile
    Playmaking
    58th percentile
    Rebounding
    97th percentile
  • 2010-1164th percentile

    5 games · 18.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    64th percentile
    Playmaking
    30th percentile
    Rebounding
    79th percentile

Context

2010-11 · 5 games · 18.2 minutes per game · Percentile against 400 measured players in 2010-11 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2010-11 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.