SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Greg Anderson: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1997-98 · 50 games

77

percentil

Greg Anderson
Confidence: lowData through: 1997-98

The question

What kind of player is Greg Anderson?

The evidence

Greg Anderson · Defensive impact: 77th percentile (DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

77 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+27) · 369 players with a sample in 1997-98

Greg Anderson: what moved most is Rebounding

56 percentilcompared against: 69 percentil (-13) · Greg Anderson, from 1991-92 to 1996-97

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 8.0 minutes per game across 50 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 77th percentile

    DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 369 players with a sample in 1997-98. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring3th percentile

    1.8 points per game

  • Playmaking4th percentile

    0.3 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact77th percentile

    DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding34th percentile

    2.4 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact77th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Rebounding34th percentile

    Low · 2.4 rebounds per game

  • Playmaking4th percentile

    Very low · 0.3 assists per game

  • Scoring3th percentile

    Very low · 1.8 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 66th percentile → 3th percentile (-63) · Playmaking: 31th percentile → 4th percentile (-27) · Rebounding: 98th percentile → 34th percentile (-64)

  • 1991-9298th percentile

    82 games · 34.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    66th percentile
    Playmaking
    31th percentile
    Rebounding
    98th percentile
  • 1993-9489th percentile

    77 games · 21.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    38th percentile
    Playmaking
    21th percentile
    Rebounding
    89th percentile
  • 1994-9560th percentile

    51 games · 12.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    9th percentile
    Playmaking
    4th percentile
    Rebounding
    60th percentile
  • 1995-9627th percentile

    46 games · 7.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    1th percentile
    Playmaking
    2th percentile
    Rebounding
    27th percentile
  • 1996-9778th percentile

    82 games · 20.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    23th percentile
    Playmaking
    10th percentile
    Rebounding
    78th percentile
  • 1997-9834th percentile

    50 games · 8.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    3th percentile
    Playmaking
    4th percentile
    Rebounding
    34th percentile

Context

1997-98 · 50 games · 8.0 minutes per game · Percentile against 369 measured players in 1997-98 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1997-98 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.