Professional DNA

Matt Bonner: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2015-16 · 30 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2015-16

The question

What kind of player is Matt Bonner?

The evidence

Matt Bonner · Defensive impact: 82th percentile (DBPM 1.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

82 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+32) · 414 players with a sample in 2015-16

Matt Bonner: what moved most is Rebounding

15 percentilcompared against: 52 percentil (-37) · Matt Bonner, from 2010-11 to 2012-13

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 6.9 minutes per game across 30 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 82th percentile
DBPM 1.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 414 players with a sample in 2015-16. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring6th percentile
2.5 points per game
Playmaking2th percentile
0.3 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact82th percentile
DBPM 1.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding1th percentile
0.9 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact82th percentile
Very high · DBPM 1.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

Scoring6th percentile
Very low · 2.5 points per game
Playmaking2th percentile
Very low · 0.3 assists per game
Rebounding1th percentile
Very low · 0.9 rebounds per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.
See Tracking →

Recent change

Scoring: 47th percentile → 6th percentile (-41) · Playmaking: 34th percentile → 2th percentile (-32) · Rebounding: 56th percentile → 1th percentile (-55)

2010-1156th percentile
66 games · 21.7 minutes per game
Scoring
47th percentile
Playmaking
34th percentile
Rebounding
56th percentile
2011-1248th percentile
65 games · 20.4 minutes per game
Scoring
43th percentile
Playmaking
33th percentile
Rebounding
48th percentile
2012-1320th percentile
68 games · 13.4 minutes per game
Scoring
24th percentile
Playmaking
14th percentile
Rebounding
20th percentile
2013-1425th percentile
61 games · 11.3 minutes per game
Scoring
15th percentile
Playmaking
15th percentile
Rebounding
25th percentile
2014-1512th percentile
72 games · 13.0 minutes per game
Scoring
13th percentile
Playmaking
19th percentile
Rebounding
12th percentile
2015-161th percentile
30 games · 6.9 minutes per game
Scoring
6th percentile
Playmaking
2th percentile
Rebounding
1th percentile

Context

2015-16 · 30 games · 6.9 minutes per game · Percentile against 414 measured players in 2015-16 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2015-16 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-13

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.