SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Stacey Augmon: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2005-06 · 36 games

70

percentil

Stacey Augmon
Confidence: lowData through: 2005-06

The question

What kind of player is Stacey Augmon?

The evidence

Stacey Augmon · Defensive impact: 70th percentile (DBPM 0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

70 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+20) · 404 players with a sample in 2005-06

Stacey Augmon: what moved most is Playmaking

24 percentilcompared against: 44 percentil (-20) · Stacey Augmon, from 2000-01 to 2004-05

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 10.7 minutes per game across 36 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 70th percentile

    DBPM 0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 404 players with a sample in 2005-06. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring7th percentile

    2.0 points per game

  • Playmaking26th percentile

    0.6 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact70th percentile

    DBPM 0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding12th percentile

    1.5 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Playmaking26th percentile

    Low · 0.6 assists per game

  • Rebounding12th percentile

    Very low · 1.5 rebounds per game

  • Scoring7th percentile

    Very low · 2.0 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 29th percentile → 7th percentile (-22) · Playmaking: 53th percentile → 26th percentile (-27) · Rebounding: 30th percentile → 12th percentile (-18)

  • 2000-0153th percentile

    66 games · 17.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    29th percentile
    Playmaking
    53th percentile
    Rebounding
    30th percentile
  • 2001-0246th percentile

    77 games · 17.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    29th percentile
    Playmaking
    46th percentile
    Rebounding
    38th percentile
  • 2002-0332th percentile

    70 games · 12.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    11th percentile
    Playmaking
    32th percentile
    Rebounding
    13th percentile
  • 2003-0443th percentile

    69 games · 20.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    38th percentile
    Playmaking
    43th percentile
    Rebounding
    30th percentile
  • 2004-0521th percentile

    55 games · 12.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    15th percentile
    Playmaking
    21th percentile
    Rebounding
    16th percentile
  • 2005-0626th percentile

    36 games · 10.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    7th percentile
    Playmaking
    26th percentile
    Rebounding
    12th percentile

Context

2005-06 · 36 games · 10.7 minutes per game · Percentile against 404 measured players in 2005-06 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2005-06 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.