SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

D.J. Mbenga: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2010-11 · 41 games

94

percentil

D.J. Mbenga
Confidence: lowData through: 2010-11

The question

What kind of player is D.J. Mbenga?

The evidence

D.J. Mbenga · Defensive impact: 94th percentile (DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

94 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+44) · 399 players with a sample in 2010-11

D.J. Mbenga: what moved most is Rebounding

16 percentilcompared against: 4 percentil (+12) · D.J. Mbenga, from 2005-06 to 2007-08

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 8.0 minutes per game across 41 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 94th percentile

    DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 399 players with a sample in 2010-11. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring1th percentile

    1.4 points per game

  • Playmaking0th percentile

    0.1 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact94th percentile

    DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding24th percentile

    2.1 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact94th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 1.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Rebounding24th percentile

    Very low · 2.1 rebounds per game

  • Scoring1th percentile

    Very low · 1.4 points per game

  • Playmaking0th percentile

    Very low · 0.1 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 4th percentile → 1th percentile (-3) · Playmaking: 0th percentile → 0th percentile (0) · Rebounding: 8th percentile → 24th percentile (+16)

  • 2005-068th percentile

    43 games · 5.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    4th percentile
    Playmaking
    0th percentile
    Rebounding
    8th percentile
  • 2006-070th percentile

    21 games · 3.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    8th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile
  • 2007-0815th percentile

    42 games · 7.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    6th percentile
    Playmaking
    2th percentile
    Rebounding
    15th percentile
  • 2008-099th percentile

    23 games · 7.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    8th percentile
    Playmaking
    10th percentile
    Rebounding
    9th percentile
  • 2009-1017th percentile

    49 games · 7.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    5th percentile
    Playmaking
    3th percentile
    Rebounding
    17th percentile
  • 2010-1124th percentile

    41 games · 8.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    1th percentile
    Playmaking
    0th percentile
    Rebounding
    24th percentile

Context

2010-11 · 41 games · 8.0 minutes per game · Percentile against 399 measured players in 2010-11 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2010-11 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.