Professional DNA

Scott Williams: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2004-05 · 19 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2004-05

The question

What kind of player is Scott Williams?

The evidence

Scott Williams · Defensive impact: 25th percentile (DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

25 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-25) · 389 players with a sample in 2004-05

Scott Williams: what moved most is Rebounding

29 percentilcompared against: 79 percentil (-50) · Scott Williams, from 1999-00 to 2002-03

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 8.0 minutes per game across 19 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 25th percentile
DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 389 players with a sample in 2004-05. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring3th percentile
1.7 points per game
Playmaking10th percentile
0.4 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact25th percentile
DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding12th percentile
1.6 rebounds per game

Limitations

Defensive impact25th percentile
Low · DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Rebounding12th percentile
Very low · 1.6 rebounds per game
Playmaking10th percentile
Very low · 0.4 assists per game
Scoring3th percentile
Very low · 1.7 points per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 51th percentile → 3th percentile (-48) · Playmaking: 10th percentile → 10th percentile (0) · Rebounding: 86th percentile → 12th percentile (-74)

1999-0086th percentile
68 games · 21.9 minutes per game
Scoring
51th percentile
Playmaking
10th percentile
Rebounding
86th percentile
2000-0178th percentile
66 games · 19.3 minutes per game
Scoring
43th percentile
Playmaking
14th percentile
Rebounding
78th percentile
2001-0274th percentile
41 games · 18.0 minutes per game
Scoring
32th percentile
Playmaking
6th percentile
Rebounding
74th percentile
2002-0335th percentile
69 games · 12.6 minutes per game
Scoring
19th percentile
Playmaking
5th percentile
Rebounding
35th percentile
2003-0440th percentile
43 games · 12.3 minutes per game
Scoring
28th percentile
Playmaking
8th percentile
Rebounding
40th percentile
2004-0512th percentile
19 games · 8.0 minutes per game
Scoring
3th percentile
Playmaking
10th percentile
Rebounding
12th percentile

Context

2004-05 · 19 games · 8.0 minutes per game · Percentile against 389 measured players in 2004-05 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2004-05 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-14

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.