Professional DNA

Charles Smith: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1996-97 · 19 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 1996-97

The question

What kind of player is Charles Smith?

The evidence

Charles Smith · Defensive impact: 87th percentile (DBPM 1.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

87 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+37) · 374 players with a sample in 1996-97

Charles Smith: what moved most is Scoring

39 percentilcompared against: 70 percentil (-31) · Charles Smith, from 1991-92 to 1995-96

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 17.3 minutes per game across 19 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 87th percentile
DBPM 1.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 374 players with a sample in 1996-97. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring29th percentile
4.6 points per game
Playmaking25th percentile
0.7 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact87th percentile
DBPM 1.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding54th percentile
3.4 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact87th percentile
Very high · DBPM 1.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

Scoring29th percentile
Low · 4.6 points per game
Playmaking25th percentile
Low · 0.7 assists per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 78th percentile → 29th percentile (-49) · Playmaking: 34th percentile → 25th percentile (-9) · Rebounding: 80th percentile → 54th percentile (-26)

1991-9278th percentile
49 games · 26.7 minutes per game
Scoring
78th percentile
Playmaking
34th percentile
Rebounding
80th percentile
1992-9368th percentile
81 games · 26.8 minutes per game
Scoring
68th percentile
Playmaking
52th percentile
Rebounding
75th percentile
1993-9462th percentile
43 games · 25.7 minutes per game
Scoring
62th percentile
Playmaking
38th percentile
Rebounding
57th percentile
1994-9573th percentile
76 games · 28.3 minutes per game
Scoring
73th percentile
Playmaking
50th percentile
Rebounding
66th percentile
1995-9649th percentile
73 games · 23.5 minutes per game
Scoring
49th percentile
Playmaking
31th percentile
Rebounding
75th percentile
1996-9729th percentile
19 games · 17.3 minutes per game
Scoring
29th percentile
Playmaking
25th percentile
Rebounding
54th percentile

Context

1996-97 · 19 games · 17.3 minutes per game · Percentile against 374 measured players in 1996-97 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 1996-97 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.