SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Robert Parish: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1996-97 · 43 games

30

percentil

Robert Parish
Confidence: lowData through: 1996-97

The question

What kind of player is Robert Parish?

The evidence

Robert Parish · Defensive impact: 30th percentile (DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

30 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-20) · 373 players with a sample in 1996-97

Robert Parish: what moved most is Rebounding

30 percentilcompared against: 81 percentil (-51) · Robert Parish, from 1991-92 to 1996-97

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 9.4 minutes per game across 43 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 30th percentile

    DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 373 players with a sample in 1996-97. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring20th percentile

    3.7 points per game

  • Playmaking16th percentile

    0.5 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact30th percentile

    DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding30th percentile

    2.1 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact30th percentile

    Low · DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Rebounding30th percentile

    Low · 2.1 rebounds per game

  • Scoring20th percentile

    Very low · 3.7 points per game

  • Playmaking16th percentile

    Very low · 0.5 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 77th percentile → 20th percentile (-57) · Playmaking: 28th percentile → 16th percentile (-12) · Rebounding: 93th percentile → 30th percentile (-63)

  • 1991-9293th percentile

    79 games · 28.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    77th percentile
    Playmaking
    28th percentile
    Rebounding
    93th percentile
  • 1992-9394th percentile

    79 games · 27.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    69th percentile
    Playmaking
    21th percentile
    Rebounding
    94th percentile
  • 1993-9489th percentile

    74 games · 26.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    69th percentile
    Playmaking
    36th percentile
    Rebounding
    89th percentile
  • 1994-9566th percentile

    81 games · 16.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    27th percentile
    Playmaking
    11th percentile
    Rebounding
    66th percentile
  • 1995-9664th percentile

    74 games · 14.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    22th percentile
    Playmaking
    10th percentile
    Rebounding
    64th percentile
  • 1996-9730th percentile

    43 games · 9.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    20th percentile
    Playmaking
    16th percentile
    Rebounding
    30th percentile

Context

1996-97 · 43 games · 9.4 minutes per game · Percentile against 373 measured players in 1996-97 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1996-97 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-13

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.