SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Jamie Watson: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1998-99 · 3 games

36

percentil

Jamie Watson
Confidence: lowData through: 1998-99

The question

What kind of player is Jamie Watson?

The evidence

Jamie Watson · Defensive impact: 36th percentile (DBPM -0.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

36 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-14) · 337 players with a sample in 1998-99

Jamie Watson: what moved most is Playmaking

5 percentilcompared against: 43 percentil (-38) · Jamie Watson, from 1994-95 to 1998-99

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 6.0 minutes per game across 3 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 36th percentile

    DBPM -0.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 337 players with a sample in 1998-99. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    0.7 points per game

  • Playmaking5th percentile

    0.3 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact36th percentile

    DBPM -0.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    0.3 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact36th percentile

    Low · DBPM -0.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Playmaking5th percentile

    Very low · 0.3 assists per game

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 0.7 points per game

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    Very low · 0.3 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 12th percentile → 0th percentile (-12) · Playmaking: 33th percentile → 5th percentile (-28) · Rebounding: 9th percentile → 0th percentile (-9)

  • 1994-9533th percentile

    60 games · 11.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    12th percentile
    Playmaking
    33th percentile
    Rebounding
    9th percentile
  • 1995-9647th percentile

    16 games · 13.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    9th percentile
    Playmaking
    47th percentile
    Rebounding
    17th percentile
  • 1996-9748th percentile

    23 games · 14.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    17th percentile
    Playmaking
    48th percentile
    Rebounding
    27th percentile
  • 1998-995th percentile

    3 games · 6.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    5th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile

Context

1998-99 · 3 games · 6.0 minutes per game · Percentile against 337 measured players in 1998-99 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1998-99 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.