SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Vincent Askew: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1997-98 · 30 games

93

percentil

Vincent Askew
Confidence: lowData through: 1997-98

The question

What kind of player is Vincent Askew?

The evidence

Vincent Askew · Defensive impact: 93th percentile (DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

93 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+43) · 369 players with a sample in 1997-98

Vincent Askew: what moved most is Scoring

6 percentilcompared against: 46 percentil (-40) · Vincent Askew, from 1992-93 to 1997-98

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 14.8 minutes per game across 30 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 93th percentile

    DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 369 players with a sample in 1997-98. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring6th percentile

    2.2 points per game

  • Playmaking44th percentile

    1.3 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact93th percentile

    DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding32th percentile

    2.3 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact93th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Playmaking44th percentile

    Average · 1.3 assists per game

  • Rebounding32th percentile

    Low · 2.3 rebounds per game

  • Scoring6th percentile

    Very low · 2.2 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 29th percentile → 6th percentile (-23) · Playmaking: 51th percentile → 44th percentile (-7) · Rebounding: 27th percentile → 32th percentile (+5)

  • 1992-9329th percentile

    73 games · 15.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    29th percentile
    Playmaking
    51th percentile
    Rebounding
    27th percentile
  • 1993-9456th percentile

    80 games · 21.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    56th percentile
    Playmaking
    66th percentile
    Rebounding
    30th percentile
  • 1994-9559th percentile

    71 games · 24.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    59th percentile
    Playmaking
    67th percentile
    Rebounding
    38th percentile
  • 1995-9650th percentile

    69 games · 25.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    50th percentile
    Playmaking
    66th percentile
    Rebounding
    49th percentile
  • 1996-9737th percentile

    43 games · 19.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    37th percentile
    Playmaking
    63th percentile
    Rebounding
    34th percentile
  • 1997-986th percentile

    30 games · 14.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    6th percentile
    Playmaking
    44th percentile
    Rebounding
    32th percentile

Context

1997-98 · 30 games · 14.8 minutes per game · Percentile against 369 measured players in 1997-98 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1997-98 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.