SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Kendall Gill: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2004-05 · 14 games

85

percentil

Kendall Gill
Confidence: lowData through: 2004-05

The question

What kind of player is Kendall Gill?

The evidence

Kendall Gill · Defensive impact: 85th percentile (DBPM 1.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

85 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+35) · 389 players with a sample in 2004-05

Kendall Gill: what moved most is Scoring

39 percentilcompared against: 61 percentil (-22) · Kendall Gill, from 1999-00 to 2004-05

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleFull rotation: 20.3 minutes per game across 14 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 85th percentile

    DBPM 1.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 389 players with a sample in 2004-05. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring39th percentile

    6.1 points per game

  • Playmaking60th percentile

    1.9 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact85th percentile

    DBPM 1.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding33th percentile

    2.6 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact85th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 1.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Scoring39th percentile

    Low · 6.1 points per game

  • Rebounding33th percentile

    Low · 2.6 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 80th percentile → 39th percentile (-41) · Playmaking: 76th percentile → 60th percentile (-16) · Rebounding: 53th percentile → 33th percentile (-20)

  • 1999-0080th percentile

    76 games · 31.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    80th percentile
    Playmaking
    76th percentile
    Rebounding
    53th percentile
  • 2000-0162th percentile

    31 games · 28.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    62th percentile
    Playmaking
    73th percentile
    Rebounding
    64th percentile
  • 2001-0238th percentile

    65 games · 21.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    38th percentile
    Playmaking
    52th percentile
    Rebounding
    36th percentile
  • 2002-0360th percentile

    82 games · 25.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    60th percentile
    Playmaking
    61th percentile
    Rebounding
    40th percentile
  • 2003-0464th percentile

    56 games · 25.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    64th percentile
    Playmaking
    53th percentile
    Rebounding
    48th percentile
  • 2004-0539th percentile

    14 games · 20.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    39th percentile
    Playmaking
    60th percentile
    Rebounding
    33th percentile

Context

2004-05 · 14 games · 20.3 minutes per game · Percentile against 389 measured players in 2004-05 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2004-05 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.