SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Jon Koncak: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1995-96 · 67 games

85

percentil

Jon Koncak
Confidence: lowData through: 1995-96

The question

What kind of player is Jon Koncak?

The evidence

Jon Koncak · Defensive impact: 85th percentile (DBPM 1.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

85 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+35) · 361 players with a sample in 1995-96

Jon Koncak: what moved most is Playmaking

30 percentilcompared against: 51 percentil (-21) · Jon Koncak, from 1990-91 to 1993-94

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 19.2 minutes per game across 67 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 85th percentile

    DBPM 1.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 361 players with a sample in 1995-96. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring9th percentile

    3.0 points per game

  • Playmaking26th percentile

    0.8 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact85th percentile

    DBPM 1.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding64th percentile

    4.1 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact85th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 1.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Playmaking26th percentile

    Low · 0.8 assists per game

  • Scoring9th percentile

    Very low · 3.0 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 20th percentile → 9th percentile (-11) · Playmaking: 50th percentile → 26th percentile (-24) · Rebounding: 70th percentile → 64th percentile (-6)

  • 1990-9150th percentile

    77 games · 25.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    20th percentile
    Playmaking
    50th percentile
    Rebounding
    70th percentile
  • 1991-9250th percentile

    77 games · 19.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    13th percentile
    Playmaking
    50th percentile
    Rebounding
    52th percentile
  • 1992-9352th percentile

    78 games · 25.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    15th percentile
    Playmaking
    52th percentile
    Rebounding
    77th percentile
  • 1993-9438th percentile

    82 games · 22.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    21th percentile
    Playmaking
    38th percentile
    Rebounding
    66th percentile
  • 1994-9525th percentile

    62 games · 15.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    9th percentile
    Playmaking
    25th percentile
    Rebounding
    47th percentile
  • 1995-9626th percentile

    67 games · 19.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    9th percentile
    Playmaking
    26th percentile
    Rebounding
    64th percentile

Context

1995-96 · 67 games · 19.2 minutes per game · Percentile against 361 measured players in 1995-96 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1995-96 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.