Professional DNA

Pete Chilcutt: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Rebounding · 1999-00 · 56 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 1999-00

The question

What kind of player is Pete Chilcutt?

The evidence

Pete Chilcutt · Rebounding: 30th percentile (2.3 rebounds per game)

30 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-20) · 378 players with a sample in 1999-00

Pete Chilcutt: what moved most is Rebounding

38 percentilcompared against: 71 percentil (-33) · Pete Chilcutt, from 1994-95 to 1995-96

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 10.7 minutes per game across 56 games
What sets them apartRebounding · 30th percentile
2.3 rebounds per game

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 378 players with a sample in 1999-00. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring5th percentile
2.1 points per game
Playmaking13th percentile
0.5 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact26th percentile
DBPM -0.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding30th percentile
2.3 rebounds per game

Limitations

Rebounding30th percentile
Low · 2.3 rebounds per game
Defensive impact26th percentile
Low · DBPM -0.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Playmaking13th percentile
Very low · 0.5 assists per game
Scoring5th percentile
Very low · 2.1 points per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 32th percentile → 5th percentile (-27) · Playmaking: 33th percentile → 13th percentile (-20) · Rebounding: 71th percentile → 30th percentile (-41)

1994-9571th percentile
68 games · 19.8 minutes per game
Scoring
32th percentile
Playmaking
33th percentile
Rebounding
71th percentile
1995-9625th percentile
74 games · 8.8 minutes per game
Scoring
6th percentile
Playmaking
10th percentile
Rebounding
25th percentile
1996-9746th percentile
54 games · 12.3 minutes per game
Scoring
17th percentile
Playmaking
32th percentile
Rebounding
46th percentile
1997-9858th percentile
82 games · 17.3 minutes per game
Scoring
30th percentile
Playmaking
44th percentile
Rebounding
58th percentile
1998-9932th percentile
46 games · 15.2 minutes per game
Scoring
16th percentile
Playmaking
24th percentile
Rebounding
32th percentile
1999-0030th percentile
56 games · 10.7 minutes per game
Scoring
5th percentile
Playmaking
13th percentile
Rebounding
30th percentile

Context

1999-00 · 56 games · 10.7 minutes per game · Percentile against 378 measured players in 1999-00 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 1999-00 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.