SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Robert Werdann: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1996-97 · 6 games

44

percentil

Robert Werdann
Confidence: lowData through: 1996-97

The question

What kind of player is Robert Werdann?

The evidence

Robert Werdann · Defensive impact: 44th percentile (DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

44 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-6) · 374 players with a sample in 1996-97

Robert Werdann: what moved most is Rebounding

5 percentilcompared against: 20 percentil (-15) · Robert Werdann, from 1992-93 to 1996-97

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 5.2 minutes per game across 6 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 44th percentile

    DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 374 players with a sample in 1996-97. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring2th percentile

    1.5 points per game

  • Playmaking0th percentile

    0.0 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact44th percentile

    DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding5th percentile

    1.0 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact44th percentile

    Average · DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Rebounding5th percentile

    Very low · 1.0 rebounds per game

  • Scoring2th percentile

    Very low · 1.5 points per game

  • Playmaking0th percentile

    Very low · 0.0 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 3th percentile → 2th percentile (-1) · Playmaking: 6th percentile → 0th percentile (-6) · Rebounding: 20th percentile → 5th percentile (-15)

  • 1992-9320th percentile

    28 games · 5.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    3th percentile
    Playmaking
    6th percentile
    Rebounding
    20th percentile
  • 1995-9620th percentile

    13 games · 7.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    9th percentile
    Playmaking
    2th percentile
    Rebounding
    20th percentile
  • 1996-975th percentile

    6 games · 5.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    2th percentile
    Playmaking
    0th percentile
    Rebounding
    5th percentile

Context

1996-97 · 6 games · 5.2 minutes per game · Percentile against 374 measured players in 1996-97 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1996-97 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.